You are here

Features

Features section

Lada 4x4 Urban: Russia’s rugged off-roader returns

By - Mar 05,2018 - Last updated at Mar 05,2018

Photos courtesy of Lada

Coinciding with Russia’s resurgence as a world power and it’s emerging role in the region, Lada is also making a comeback to certain Middle East Markets, including Jordan, as of late last year.

The right car at the right time for Jordanian motorists, Lada’s affordable model range is an antidote to rising prices. Star among the Russian carmaker’s line-up, however, remains its long-serving, compact, rugged and iconic 4x4.

Ditching the familiar Niva nameplate, the Lada 4x4 is improved but little changed since it was first launched 40 years ago, it does make slight concessions to comfort and convenience in Urban trim level, as driven.

 

Attainable icon

 

Though mildly refreshed cosmetically and with more comfort than before, the Lada 4x4 oozes authenticity, and is a product of Soviet times that remains relevant today. Engineered for rugged off-road ability in harsh rural Russian conditions, the 4x4 is however also designed to be comfortable and manoeuvrable on city streets, and in that regard was ahead of its time and long predated the now wildly popular crossover SUV segment. Uncomplicated, unpretentious and easily maintainable, the 4x4 was both a “people’s car” and Russian answer to Land Rover and Jeep when launched, and is now one of the most affordable, manoeuvrable and off-road capable cars available.

An affordable and utilitarian daily car for many, the Lada 4x4 is for others an attainable second or third occasional, dedicated or hobby vehicle like a Caterham for trackday enthusiasts or a Harley-Davidson for weekend bikers.

Ideal for mechanical and aesthetic customisation and off-road adventuring, the 4x4 offers extensive ability and peace of mind over inhospitable terrain, next to “precious” SUVs costing multiples more. Iconic and honest, the petite 4x4’s features boxy, uncomplicated styling and surfacing, with distinctive low-slung headlights and revised vertical rear lights. The Urban version driven additionally features new integrated body colour bumpers and more road-friendly 16-inch alloy wheels and 185/75R16 tyres.

 

Engaging driver

 

Powered by a proven, uncomplicated and lower revving naturally-aspirated 1.7-litre 8-valve SOHC 4-cylinder petrol engine mounted in-line, the Lada 4x4 develops 83HP at 5000rpm and 95lb/ft at 4000rpm. With aggressive gearing, light 1210kg weight and little sound deadening, the 4x4 feels quicker than the 17-seconds it takes from standstill to 100km/h. Meanwhile, its engine is responsive and eager in lower and mid-range, delivering perky city and confident motorway driving. Progressive in delivery but with good low-end pull, the 4x4 accumulating speed well on motorway, but sounds strained and gruff as revs rise toward the redline, while acceleration trails off somewhat as it nears its 142km/h top speed.

Available exclusively with a 5-speed manual gearbox with long and angled gear lever, the Lada 4x4, however, shift action is shorter than one imagines. Crisp, clean and satisfyingly firm, mechanical and precise through ratios, and with intuitive clarity to its clutch biting point, the 4x4’s manual gearbox adds immensely to its uncorrupted and engaging driving experience. Driving the rear wheels in normal on-road conditions and moderate dirt roads, the Lada’s 4x4 system is, however, engaged with a separate lever for more demanding off-road driving. The Lada’s off-road hardware also includes low-ratio four-wheel-drive to drive with full power at crawling pace for yet more extreme off-road conditions and inclines.

 

Agile adventurer

 

An innovative and genuine dual-use vehicle for off-road and practical daily driving when first launched, the Lada 4x4 is built on a unibody frame underpinned by independent double wishbone front and live-axle, coil-spring rear suspension for comfort and ability. If not as insulated from noise as more modern crossovers, the Lada rides with refined and forgiving fluency over Jordan’s lumpy, bumpy roads and on rugged unpaved roads. With supple suspension absorbent high profile tyres and small wheelbase, the Lada 4x4, however, felt surprisingly more buttoned down in vertical travel over crests and dips, and better damped and settled on rebound than quite a few more modern cars.

Small and light with short wheelbase, big footprint and balanced chassis and weighting, the Lada 4x4 is unexpectedly engaging and fun on road, especially given its primary reputation for off-road ability. Weaving through winding county switchbacks in rear-drive mode, the Lada like to be pushed hard, with its slim tyres and well-weighted hydraulic-assisted steering providing decent road feel and its accurate throttle control allowing one to gradually dial in power out of corners. Confident through corners and seemingly immune to under- or over-steer in most situations, and while body lean is more pronounced than with a stiffer more modern car, it remains nevertheless delivers reassuringly committed road-holding.

 

Affordable ability

 

Stable at motorway speeds for so small a car, the Lada 4x4 is also agile and manoeuvrable. Turning on the proverbial dime through corners, it is easily manoeuvrable through narrow country and city roads, and can access narrow off-road trails that larger SUVs can’t. Ruggedly effective, the 4x4’s off-road ability is extensive, and includes excellent 213mm ground clearance and approach, break-over and departure angles owing to its size and short overhangs. In addition to estimated 510-600mm water fording and 1,000mm snow fording capability, the Lada 4x4 also features a locking rear differential keep it moving over steep inclines, low traction surfaces and extreme off-road conditions.

A victory of engineering minimalism over excess, the 4x4’s boxy design and small 3,640mm long and 1,680mm wide dimensions provide excellent visibility and manoeuvrability in tight confines, and terrific space efficiency and packaging. Accommodating four adults, the 3-door 4x4 features good headroom front and rear, and 263-litre cargo volume that expands to 982-litre. 

Relatively minimalist inside, the 4x4’s comfortable cabin features tough hard plastics and clear instrumentation, but now includes conveniences like electric windows and two-speed A/C. Meanwhile, upright seating and driving position are good, but better side and lumbar support, steering reach adjustment and rear head restraints would be welcome features.

Among the most affordable and accessible cars available in Jordan presently at JD13,500 on the road with a recently advertised down payment of JD999, the Lada 4x4 Urban comes with a 3-year warranty inclusive of a 60,000km parts and labour service package and unlimited mileage roadside assistance, and a 6-year paint warranty.

 

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

  • Engine: 1.7-litre, in-line 4-cylinders
  • Bore x stroke: 82 x 80mm
  • Compression ratio: 9.3:1
  • Valve-train: 8-valve, SOHC
  • Gearbox: 5-speed manual, four-wheel-drive
  • Driveline: low gear transfer, locking rear differential
  • Final drive: 3.9:1
  • Power, BHP (PS) [kW]: 82 (83) [61] @5000rpm
  • Specific power: 48.5BHP/litre
  • Power-to-weight: 63.8 (kerb)
  • Torque, lb/ft (Nm): 95 (129) @4,000rpm
  • Specific torque: 100.4Nm/litre
  • Torque-to-weight: (kerb)
  • 0-100km/h: 17-seconds
  • Top speed: 142km/h
  • Fuel consumption, combined: 9.9-litres/100km
  • Fuel capacity: 50-litres
  • Length: 3,640mm
  • Width: 1,680mm
  • Height: 1,640mm
  • Wheelbase: 2,200mm
  • Overhang, F/R: 650/780mm
  • Track, F/R: 1,440/1,420mm
  • Minimum ground clearance: 213mm
  • Cargo volume, min/max: 263-/982-litres
  • Water fording: 510-600mm (est.)
  • Snow fording: 1,000mm (est.)
  • Slope angle 58° (est.)
  • Unladen/kerb weight: 1,210/1,285kg
  • Gross weight: 1,610kg
  • Towing capacity, braked/unbraked: 600/300kg
  • Suspension, F: Independent, Double wishbones, coilovers
  • Suspension, R: Trailing arm, Panhard rod, coil springs
  • Steering: Power-assisted recirculating ball
  • Turning circle: 11-metres
  • Brakes, F/R: Discs/drums
  • Tyres: 185/75R16

 

Price, on the road: JD13,500

 

‘The Shape of Water’ triumphs at nail-biting Oscars

By - Mar 05,2018 - Last updated at Mar 05,2018

HOLLYWOOD, California — “The Shape of Water” on Sunday won top honours at the Oscars including the coveted best picture statuette, bringing the curtain down on a Hollywood awards season overshadowed by scandal over sexual misconduct in showbiz.

Guillermo del Toro’s fairy tale romance led the charge going into the show with 13 nominations, and took home best picture — the top prize of the night — as well as best director and statuettes for production design and best original score.

In a night of honours being shared fairly evenly among several candidates, Martin McDonagh’s dark crime comedy “Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri” had to settle for best actress for Frances McDormand and best supporting actor for Sam Rockwell.

Christopher Nolan’s World War II thriller “Dunkirk” also picked up three awards, but in the less glitzy technical categories, while several movies ended the evening with two trophies.

“I am an immigrant,” an emotional Del Toro said in collecting his first prize of the night, praising the power of filmmaking to “erase the line in the sand” between people of different countries and cultures.

“I want to dedicate this to every young filmmaker — the youth that is showing us how things are done,” he said. 

“I thought this could never happen. It happens. And I want to tell you, everyone that is dreaming of using fantasy to tell the stories about the things that are real in the world today — you can do it.”

In Del Toro’s native Guadalajara exuberant fans everywhere from swanky parties to street parades celebrated their hometown hero, with one ecstatic crowd chanting, “Ole, ole ole ole! Toro, Toro!” 

 

‘Long overdue’ 

 

Hosted for the second straight year by late night funnyman Jimmy Kimmel, the 90th Academy Awards capped a difficult few months during, which the industry has declared war on the pervasive culture of sexual impropriety unearthed by the downfall of movie mogul and alleged serial sex attacker Harvey Weinstein.

Kimmel set the tone by targeting Weinstein in his opening monologue, describing the disgraced producer’s downfall following dozens of allegations of sexual harassment and assault as “long overdue”.

“We can’t let bad behaviour slide anymore. The world is watching us. We need to set an example,” he said. 

McDormand, a winner throughout the awards season for her scintillating turn as a grieving, rage-filled mother in “Three Billboards”, took home her second Oscar, 21 years after winning for “Fargo”.

In a statement about the need for inclusion in the industry, she got all of the female nominees in the room to stand to highlight their work.

“We all have stories to tell and projects we need financed,” she said to enthusiastic applause.

Her “Three Billboards” co-star Rockwell kicked off the night by claiming best supporting actor for his acclaimed turn as a racist, violent police officer.

Best actor went to runaway favourite Gary Oldman, who sat in make-up for three hours a day to disappear entirely into the role of British wartime prime minister Winston Churchill for “Darkest Hour”.

Allison Janney won best supporting actress for her turn as the cold, sardonic mother of disgraced figure skater Tonya Harding in “I, Tonya” — capping a sparkling awards season which saw her sweep the major prizes.

“My fellow nominees, you represent everything that is good and right and human about this profession. You are all extraordinary,” the statuesque 58-year-old Janney, the overwhelming favourite, enthused at the podium.

 

Activism

 

With the #MeToo and Time’s Up campaigns against sexual misconduct and gender inequality dominating the 2018 awards circuit, this year’s Oscars gala was seen as an opportunity for Tinseltown to support female filmmaking.

Greta Gerwig, only the fifth woman in Oscars history to be nominated for best director — for comedy/drama “Lady Bird” — went home empty-handed, despite other nominations for best picture and best screenplay.

There was also the first nod in history for a female cinematographer — Rachel Morrison, who shot Dee Rees’s racial drama “Mudbound” — although the award ended up going to Roger Deakins on his 14th attempt, for “Blade Runner 2049”.

The Time’s Up initiative was not as visible as at the Golden Globes in January, with no coordinated protest — like the striking Globes red carpet “blackout”.

But towards the end of the show, Salma Hayek fronted the presentation of a video of stars advocating for women’s rights and racial equality, including Ava DuVernay, Chadwick Boseman, Lee Daniels and Geena Davis.

“This entire fall, [through] the #MeToo, the Time’s Up movements, everyone is getting a voice to express something that has been happening forever, not only in Hollywood, but in every walk of life,” said Mira Sorvino [“Mighty Aphrodite”].

In another nod to the women’s movements, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences tapped past winners Jennifer Lawrence and Jodie Foster — on crutches — to present McDormand’s best actress Oscar.

Traditionally, the previous year’s best actor winner would present that statuette, but Casey Affleck, who triumphed in 2017 for “Manchester by the Sea”, withdrew under a cloud of sexual harassment accusations he denies.

 

Presenters atone for 2017 flub

 

Other winners included Pixar’s “Coco” for best animated feature and “A Fantastic Woman” — a love story from Chilean director Sebastian Lelio with a much-praised star turn from transgender actress Daniela Vega — in the foreign film category.

And Jordan Peele won the award for best original screenplay for his highly acclaimed debut film, horror satire “Get Out”.

Organisers were looking to rebound after last year’s flubbed announcement by Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway of the best picture winner — the trophy was initially given to “La La Land”, when the actual winner was “Moonlight”.

In a surprise turn of events, Beatty and Dunaway were tapped to present the same prize this time around and the presentation went without a hitch.

“It’s so nice seeing you again,” joked Beatty, to laughs from the audience.

‘Why am I not losing weight?’

Medical reasons for women’s weight problems and how to get tested

Mar 04,2018 - Last updated at Mar 04,2018

Photo courtesy of Family Flavours magazine

By Dr Renad Seheimat

Clinical Pathologist 

& Laboratory Medicine Specialist

 

Are you finding weight difficult to lose? Even with exercise and a restricted-calorie diet, are you still gaining weight? Well, it is incredibly hard to win against an obstacle you do not know is there! Your own body hormones may simply be way out of balance. Maybe it is time to visit the lab for a check-up. Here are some of the important blood tests for resolving stubborn weight.

 

Your thyroid hormones

 

An underactive thyroid (hypothyroidism) is generally associated with a low metabolic rate and some weight gain. The cause of the weight gain is also complex and not always related to excess fat accumulation. Most of the extra weight gained in hypothyroid individuals is due to excess accumulation of salt and water. Massive weight gain is rare. In general, two to five kilogrammes of body weight may be attributable to the thyroid and if weight gain is the only symptom of underactive thyroid, it is less likely that the weight gain is solely caused by the thyroid.

 

Your insulin levels

 

The most significant factor in fat storage is the level of insulin in the blood. This is such a key point to understand. Insulin is known to be a fat building hormone, so excess levels are sure to guarantee fat accumulation in the body. Not only does insulin result in fat storage but it also prevents the breakdown of fat as an energy source. Insulin resistance (when insulin levels are sufficiently high over a prolonged period of time, causing the body’s own sensitivity to the hormone to be reduced) increases the risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Hence, it makes sense to get your fasting blood sugar and insulin levels tested. Consuming complex carbohydrates helps control insulin levels and makes losing weight easier. In some cases, a medication is prescribed to improve insulin sensitivity, promoting the use of sugar for energy production.

 

Your sex hormones

 

High levels of testosterone hormone levels are seen in women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS). If you are struggling with weight and have irregular periods or excess hair growth, it would be wise to visit your gynaecologist, who will check your testosterone, follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinising hormone.

 

Vitamins and minerals

 

I also recommend checking your iron, zinc, vitamin D and B 12 levels. They are responsible for helping your body use oxygen to burn sugar and produce energy. Adequate intake of vitamins and minerals is important to ensure optimum energy production, making exercise and weight loss easier.

 

Stress hormones

 

Chronic stress leads to prolonged periods of high cortisol levels. Cortisol is one of our stress hormones that increase our sugar level and fat storage, which in turn may lead to insulin resistance and weight gain around the middle of the body, further hindering weight loss. Keep in mind it also increases cravings, especially for sugary foods. You can check your cortisol levels in the lab with a blood test or saliva analysis.

 

 

Reprinted with permission from Family Flavours magazine

Casting out imaginary devils

By - Mar 04,2018 - Last updated at Mar 05,2018

Blood and Faith: The Purging of Muslim Spain, 1492-1614
Matthew Carr
London: Hurst and Company, 2017
Pp. 427

One tends to associate the end of Muslim Spain with the fall of Granada in 1492, but Matthew Carr focuses on the ensuing century which climaxed in the years, 1609-1614, with the expulsion of more than 350,000 men, women and children known as Moriscos.

These descendants of the Muslims who conquered Spain in 711, had converted to Christianity decades earlier, but still did not conform to the rigid demands of Catholic Spain’s rulers, at a time when the Inquisition was in full force. “Blood and Faith” investigates the causes and consequences of “what was then the largest removal of a civilian population in European history, even larger than Spain’s previous expulsion of the Jews… the tragedy of the Moriscos was part of a recurring dynamic that has been repeated in many other contexts, in which a powerful majority seeks to remake or define its own identity through the physical elimination or removal of supposedly incompatible minorities, whose presence is imagined as potentially defiling or corrupting”. (pp. 1, 3)

Carr compares the Moriscos’ expulsion to modern examples of ethnic cleansing — of Native Americans, Armenians, the Holocaust, the population exchanges when India and Pakistan were created, the Palestinian exodus in 1948, and the Yugoslav civil wars. Most urgently, he finds parallels to today: “At a time when Europe’s Muslim minorities and Islam itself are seen as a threat to Europe’s cultural and political identity and even as the antithesis of a certain notion of European civilization, it seemed to me potentially useful and instructive to examine how and why the rulers of Catholic Spain destroyed the last vestiges of Islam in Iberia.” (p. ix)

Thus, Carr links this book to his other recent one: “Fortress Europe: Inside the War Against Immigration” (Hurst, 2015).

The book chronicles the debates about how to deal with the Moriscos, which raged in Spain’s Catholic and royal circles for over a century. It also elucidates the socioeconomic conditions prevailing at the time, which coincided with Spain’s rise to be the dominant colonial power and its ambition to rule a united, transnational Catholic kingdom. Spurred on by religious and cultural bigotry, Spain’s rulers debated whether it was enough to convert the Moriscos, whether they should be assimilated or separated from Christian society, expelled from the country, or even exterminated.

Repression of a suspect minority went hand-in-hand with colonial conquest: “as Cortes completed his subjugation of Aztec Mexico in the name of the faith, bands of militiamen conducted their class war cum religious crusade in the Valencian countryside, killing, robbing, and converting Muslims and consecrating their mosques as churches”. (p. 106)

Spain’s concurrent wars with Protestant Europe and the Ottoman Empire made the Moriscos’ status even more perilous, for they were suspected of collaborating with external enemies, and their loyalty questioned. 

Along with Islam and learning, the Moors had brought new crops to Spain — sugar, rice, oranges, lemons, silk and coffee. The invigorated agricultural sector, plus expanded trade, laid the foundation for a prosperous, relatively stable and tolerant, multicultural society. “At a time when the largest library in Christian Europe was no more than six hundred volumes, a cottage industry of Arabic calligraphers in Cordoba was churning out some 60,000 handwritten books every year.” (p. 10)

Though Spain’s rulers had little regard for the Arabic language or the rich hybrid culture created in Andalusia, they were concerned about prosperity. The predominance of Moriscos in the agricultural labour force figured heavily into the debates, repeatedly delaying the expulsion decision, as Spanish landowners were opposed. Indeed, after the expulsion, fields and orchards lay fallow in many places — one of several examples cited in the book that the expulsion did not actually benefit Spain.

Besides the sweeping panorama of a critical historical period that Carr provides, his approach reminds that the course of history is not black-and-white; there are always exceptions. Not all Christians had a negative view of Muslims, or vice versa; in times of danger, some Christians protected Muslims, and vice versa. Perhaps the hardest phenomenon to make generalisations about is the attitude of the Moriscos who were coerced into being Christians and hounded into adopting European dress and customs and “forgetting” Arabic. While some became sincere Christians, it is doubtful that the majority did. “Long after their initial conversions, many Moriscos continued to inhabit a parallel Islamic world beneath a façade of Christianity.” (p. 133) 

Per definition, it is not possible to know how many continued to practice their Muslim faith in secret, for if discovered, they were brought before the Inquisition courts and subject to severe punishments, including being burned at the stake. And that is beside the point; Spain is the only home they had known, and they had been productive members of society.

Carr’s account is a powerful warning of the perils of intolerance of difference and of policies of forced conversion and assimilation. Besides destroying the truth, such policies destroyed many lives and communities, while the subsequent expulsions caused untold death, sickness, impoverishment and separation of families. As the author concludes: “Four hundred years later, the destruction of the Moriscos is an example of what can happen when a society succumbs to its worst instincts and its worst fears in an attempt to cast out its imaginary devils.” (p. 375)

Do selfies make your nose look bigger?

By - Mar 04,2018 - Last updated at Mar 04,2018

Photo courtesy of alice1059.com

It is the inescapable 21st-century vexation of the vain. Smartphones allow a person to take selfies as fast as the index finger can click, yet from a dismayingly close distance that may leave the subject dissatisfied.

Do not fret, a team of researchers from Rutgers and Stanford says in a recent published analysis. The culprit is distortion.

Using a mathematical model, the group found that in a selfie taken from 30 centimetres away, the nose appears 30 per cent wider than in a photo taken from 1.5 metres.

The researchers undertook the analysis because plastic-surgery patients — who spent more than $16 billion on cosmetic procedures in 2016, according to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons — often cited their appearance in selfies as justification for getting a nose job.

Boris Paskhover, an assistant professor at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School’s department of otolaryngology, wanted to set the record straight.

“Young adults are constantly taking selfies to post to social media and think those images are representative of how they really look, which can have an impact on their emotional state,” Paskhover said in a Rutgers news release. “I want them to realise that when they take a selfie, they are in essence looking into a portable funhouse mirror.”

To calculate the degree of nasal distortion in up-close photos, Paskhover worked with Ohad Fried, a research fellow in Stanford’s computer science department. In addition to the 30 per cent increase in the apparent width of the nose in selfies, the team also found that the close vantage point made the tip of the nose appear 7 per cent wider.

Their findings were published in JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery.

‘Emoji Movie’ swoons below Cruise, Gibson at ‘worst in film’ Razzies

By - Mar 04,2018 - Last updated at Mar 04,2018

Scene from the ‘The Emoji Movie’ which won a Razzie Award for worst film on Saturday (Photo courtesy of imdb.com)

LOS ANGELES — Animated “The Emoji Movie” stunk up the annual Razzie Awards on Saturday, tanking below all contenders for worst achievements in film, while Tom Cruise and Mel Gibson were also roasted for 2017’s most ignoble performances.

In its 38th year, the Razzies serves as a tongue-in-cheek response to the Sunday’s Academy Awards by handing out $4.97 gold spray-painted berry trophies.

“The Emoji Movie”, Sony Pictures children’s film about talking emoticons, earned four Golden Raspberries, including worst picture, director and screenplay.

“The Emoji Movie” received Hollywood’s most famous frown, the Razzie Award, for worst picture of 2017, making it the first animated feature to earn the top dishonour.

“Leading this year’s list of movie-misfires is the emoticon-based, talking poop opus,” the Razzies said in a statement announcing the recipients, saying the film came in a year when “Hollywood’s recycled trash heap attained an all-time high” and saw a “toxic-level lack of originality”.

The annual awards bestowed on the worst the movie business has to offer were announced on Saturday in their traditional spot, the day before the Academy Awards.

“The Emoji Movie” landed four of the 10 Razzies given out this year, also taking worst screenplay, worst director, and worst screen combo, which was given to “any two obnoxious emojis” from the movie.

Cruise won worst actor for his leading role as a US army sergeant who accidentally unleashes mayhem by disturbing an ancient grave in the much-maligned action reboot “The Mummy”. 

He now has no Oscars after three nominations, but two Razzies.

Cruise and Brad Pitt won for worst screen couple for 1994’s “Interview with the Vampire”.

Gibson was bestowed the worst supporting actor for his comedic turn in “Daddy’s Home 2” alongside John Lithgow, Will Ferrell and Mark Wahlberg.

Tyler Perry, a perennial Razzie punching bag, took home the worst actress raspberry for his popular drag character Madea in “Boo 2: A Medea Halloween”.

Oscar-winning actress Kim Basinger earned the Razzie dishonour for her supporting role in erotic romance “Fifty Shades Darker”, while the big screen adaptation of TV series “Baywatch” won the fan-voted award of “nominee so bad you loved it!”

“Baywatch”, won the inaugural “Special Rotten Tomatoes Award: The Razzie Nominee So Bad You Loved It!” The award is the result of an online poll held in conjunction with the review site Rotten Tomatoes.

The Razzies are chosen by more than 1,000 voting members from more than 26 countries, organisers said.

Voice shopping to expand tremendously by 2022

By - Mar 04,2018 - Last updated at Mar 04,2018

Photo courtesy of apptweak.com

The retail revolution shifting sales from stores to laptops to smartphones could be on the verge of its next sea change—when shoppers will ask Amazon’s Alexa, and other voice-driven speakers, to order just about, well, everything.

Purchases made through devices like Google Home and Amazon’s Echo are projected to leap from $2 billion today to $40 billion by 2022, as technology improves, US consumers become more comfortable, and the speakers become nearly as commonplace in homes as a flat-screen TV, according to a new study from OC&C Strategy Consultants.

“We really see this as the next big disruptive play in US retail,’’ says John Franklin, associate partner at OC&C which surveyed 1,500 smart speaker owners in December .

The smart speaker space is one that many tech giants want to play in. Though Amazon and its digital helper Alexa have come to define the niche, Google Home with its Google Assistant is second in popularity. Apple began shipping its Siri-assisted HomePod smart speaker in February. Microsoft’s “Cortana” is also part of the mix.

For now, the most popular use of voice-driven speakers is to play music or find out whether to take an umbrella when heading out the front door, OC&C says.

But with virtual assistants that can turn up a thermostat and even rattle off jokes, voice-driven speakers are at the centre of a budding universe of artificial intelligence connected devices that include bathroom mirrors, door locks, and TV monitors. Smart home product sales are expected to total $4.5 billion this year, up 34 per cent from 2017, according to The Consumer Technology Association.

Among the US residents who have a smart speaker, 62 per cent have used it to buy groceries or some other item, according to OC&C’s study. And the report predicts that the percentage of US homes with a smart speaker will rise from the current 13 per cent to 55 per cent by 2022.

“That number has been going up incredibly rapidly over the last two years,’’ Franklin says. “That’s clearly a big driver in the overall potential in voice shopping. We then expect household spend with smart speakers will increase also.’’

Amazon is still king

 

Amazon, which first upended the retail environment when it wooed readers away from traditional book stores, then became the go-to for many online shoppers interested in items ranging from toys to tools, now dominates the emerging smart speaker space as well.

The Amazon Echo is used in 10 per cent of US households, followed by Google, which is in 4 per cent of US homes, and Microsoft’s Cortana which comes in at 2 per cent.

Amazon’s strength should give other retailers pause, Franklin says.

“Retailers should be taking notice of this primarily because of the way Amazon is pushing this technology and the potential Amazon has to access consumers on a regular basis and in a very intimate way,’’ he says.

But Google is pushing back. With visitors increasingly starting their browsing on Amazon instead of Google, the world’s largest search engine has been linking up with a range of retailers including Whole Foods, Costco and Walmart, whose items are available through its shopping and delivery service Google Express.

With Express, customers can place orders through Google Home as well as on the Google Express website and app.

 

Voice shopping faces obstacles

 

Still, there are hurdles that could slow down how quickly shoppers take to voice shopping— and how lucrative voice-based purchases are for retailers.

Currently, it can be difficult to compare prices when ordering via speaker and customers often have to use specific wording like “Ok Google’’ when launching their transactions.

For retailers, OC&C found that the tally from voice orders is not typically as high as purchases made online, with shoppers more apt to buy cheaper items like phone charger cables via voice, than a high-priced appliance. The average online basket was $661 for online purchases of electronics, as compared to $239 for voice orders, OC&C said.

Then, there is the matter of trust. Among shoppers who are not currently making purchases through a smart speaker, only 45 per cent trust that the device would recommend the best reviewed products.

But among those who do shop via voice, 83 per cent say they have confidence in the virtual assistant’s suggestions — signalling that once consumers try the new way of summoning goods and services, they often like it.

Those numbers give “us confidence this isn’t simply a fad, but is a meaningful channel that will continue to disrupt retail over the next five years and beyond’”, Franklin says.

Samsung launches S9 and S9 Plus phones

By - Mar 02,2018 - Last updated at Mar 02,2018

Photo courtesy of samsung.com

BARCELONA — Samsung unveiled its new flagship smartphone earlier in the week with a focus on augmented reality features as it seeks to keep its title as the world’s biggest smartphone maker.

The South Korean firm showcased the Galaxy S9 on the eve of the official start of the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, which comes after a year of flat smartphone sales.

With no other major handset maker using the annual event, the world’s largest phone show, to launch a new flagship device this year, Samsung had the opportunity to grab the spotlight.

The S9 features essentially the same design as last year’s previous flagship, with the full screen and curved glass edge of the S8, which was followed by Apple’s iPhone X and others.

Samsung also launched the S9 Plus at a price of 997 euros.

But it includes a louder sound, a faster processor and software that turns selfies into animated emojis, which will appeal to consumers who are increasingly preferring to use their phones to send text messages rather than talking.

Samsung also included a dual lense camera on the Galaxy S line for the first time, which will improve low-light capture and enhance slow motion video, which is popular on social media.

A service powered by artificial intelligence allows users to point its camera to instantly translate a sign in a foreign language.

It is also one of the few flagship phones left that still comes with a standard headphone jack.

“Despite these incremental innovations, Samsung will have to smartly leverage its brand and marketing machine to correctly position the new smartphones to a target audience,” said Forrester analyst Thomas Husson.

Global smartphone sales fell by 6.3 per cent in the fourth quarter due to slower than expected Christmas sales, according to research firm IDC.

Overall global smartphone sales for 2017 were virtually flat — down 0.1 per cent at 1.47 billion units — as phone makers struggled to come up with innovations that encourage customers to upgrade their devices.

Samsung suffered a humiliating recall of its Galaxy Note 7 device in 2016 after several devices exploded, but its Galaxy 8 smartphone was a consumer and critical success.

While it kept its lead over Apple as the world’s biggest seller of smartphones in 2017 with a 21.6 per cent market share, up from 21.1 per cent in the previous year, Samsung faces stiffer competition from Chinese rivals like Huawei and Xiaomi that offer cheaper handsets with many high-end features.

The S9 will sell for 841 euros, a price which analysts warned could turn off many consumers.

While the S9’s camera is “markedly different” in quality from older smartphones that people already own “consumers may delay purchase because of rising flagship prices”, IHS Markit said in a research note.

“Samsung must work hard to market the benefits of these designs to counter negative pricing perception.”

Teen sexting more common than you think

By - Mar 01,2018 - Last updated at Mar 01,2018

Photo courtesy of city.fi

At least one in four teens are receiving sexually explicit texts and e-mails, and at least one in seven are sending sexts, a new study suggests. 

Sexting can be a healthy way for young people to explore sexuality and intimacy when it is consensual, said lead study author Sheri Madigan of the Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute and the University of Calgary in Canada. The trouble is that when it is coerced, or when sexts are shared without permission, it can feel a lot like cyberbullying, with many of the same dangerous mental health consequences. 

More than one in 10 teens are forwarding these sexts without consent, the study found. And roughly one in 12 teens have had sexts they sent shared without their permission. 

“Today’s teens often do not separate their online and offline lives — it is all the same to them,” Madigan said by e-mail. “This is hard for parents to grasp.” 

Most teens do not report sexting at all, and those who do send or receive sexually explicit messages, videos or images tend to be older, researchers report in JAMA Paediatrics.

Researchers examined data on sexting habits from 39 previously published studies with a total of 110,380 teens. Participants were 15 years old on average, although they ranged in age from about 12 to 17. 

Because kids today typically have a smartphone by the time they are 10 years old, parents should address sexting as part of any early conversations they have with kids about practising safe sex and protecting their privacy online, Madigan advised. 

“It can be helpful for parents to think about sexting in the same way they think about sex,” said Elizabeth Englander, author of an accompanying editorial and director of the Massachusetts Aggression Reduction Centre at Bridgewater State University. 

Rather than forbid sexting outright, parents should be teaching children to consider the consequences of doing it and help kids understand how to resist pressure to do anything that makes them feel uncomfortable, Englander said by e-mail. 

“Youth think of adults as worriers and as over-estimating risk, particularly when technology is involved, and many will tune out adults who just tell them ‘don’t do this’,” said Lisa Jones, a researcher at the Crimes Against Children Research Centre at the University of New Hampshire in Durham. 

“But sexting can be risky, and certainly nonconsensual sharing of explicit images is hurtful and even potentially criminal,” Jones, who was not involved in the study, said by e-mail. 

The study was not a controlled experiment designed to prove whether or how sexting might cause health problems for teens. Another drawback is that many of the smaller studies in the analysis used different definitions of sexting that made it difficult to determine how often teens are sharing explicit words, videos or photos. 

Still, the results emphasize the importance of frank discussions about safe sexting, Jones said. 

“Youth need to have adults providing them with accurate information,” Jones added.

Integration of fibre optics and solar energy in computers

By - Mar 01,2018 - Last updated at Mar 01,2018

There is a first recurring question in the world of technology and it is about Fibre Optics (FO). Given the strong push for FO in telecommunications and Internet everywhere, and given the extraordinary difference in transmission speeds between optical cables and copper wires, why is the industry not yet using optical wiring inside computers, tablets and smartphones? Surely, this would make them run much faster, while consuming significantly less power.

The second recurring question is about solar energy, and in a way it goes in parallel with the first. Is not it time that portable computers, tablets and smartphones be powered by solar energy? With the huge progress achieved in photovoltaic cells leading to excellent efficiency and performance, one would think that replacing a smartphone’s traditional battery with photovoltaic cells would be child’s play.

The truth is that none of the above is as simple as it may look. Naturally, there will come a day when, with optical cabling inside and powered by solar energy, the computer of the future will make the laptop we are using today as ridiculously obsolete as your first not-so-smart-phone that you had in the mid-1990s would look today. This is not going to happen overnight, however.

Optical cables shine (no pun intended) when used particularly over networks and long distances. This, for now at least, is the perfect, ideal field of application for the technology. Despite their obvious and many advantages, they too have some inherent weaknesses. They are more fragile than copper wires, simply because they are made of… glass! They tend to break. They are also difficult to cut, “weld” and manipulate, in a general manner. Last but not least, they are still more expensive than copper.

There are also other considerations pertaining to specific digital electronic circuitry that prevent optical cables to be used instead of copper. Therefore, to have a computer, tablet or smartphone where optical cables completely replace copper, we will have to wait until more than one simple technological revolution takes place.

Solar energy, on the other hand, may be a less complex issue, but here to there is still some way to go before we can own a smartphone or a laptop computer that would fully run on solar energy, like those great desk calculators that have become the norm and never need batteries, or at the other extreme of examples, like Solar Impulse, the celebrated Swiss pioneering solar-powered aircraft.

Leading manufacturers like Panasonic, SunPower or LG have recently achieved amazing rates of efficiency with their photovoltaic panels. The first two have reached an efficiency of 20.2 per cent, whereas LG has a good 18.3 per cent. Most other manufacturers are still around an average of 14.5 per cent.

Tesla, the famous American maker of electric cars and the brainchild of the equally famous Elon Musk, has announced that they are planning to make roof tiles that also work as solar panels! Definitely another milestone on the road to universal solar power for houses.

No one can foretell if the next giant step that will put optical cables inside digital devices and make them run on solar energy will take place in 10, 20 years or more. Less than 10 does not sound reasonable, but who knows, technology is full of surprises.

In the meantime, smartphones makers manage to keep us interested with more and more sophisticated cameras.

Pages

Pages



Newsletter

Get top stories and blog posts emailed to you each day.

PDF