You are here

Region

Region section

Questions emerge on Israel's West Bank annexation plans

US proposal gives Israel green light to annex key parts of West Bank

By - Jan 30,2020 - Last updated at Jan 30,2020

Palestinian demonstrators stand on the back of an Israeli forces jeep during a demonstration near the West Bank village of Tubas, near the Jordan Valley, on Wednesday, during a demonstration against the US President Donald Trump's peace proposals (AFP photo)

OCCUPIED JERUSALEM — Questions surfaced Thursday over whether Israel would immediately seek to annex parts of the West Bank, after US President Donald Trump's controversial peace plan called for extending Israeli sovereignty into the area.

The plan, seen as overwhelmingly supportive of Israeli goals, has been firmly rejected by the Palestinians and triggered protests in Gaza and the West Bank, including isolated confrontations with Israeli forces.

Trump's proposal gives Israel a US green light to annex key parts of the occupied West Bank, including in the strategic Jordan Valley.

But uncertainty mounted Thursday over Israel's next moves.

After Trump unveiled his long-awaited plan in Washington on Tuesday, his ambassador to Israel David Friedman said Israel "does not have to wait at all".

Israeli officials said Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a staunch Trump ally, would seek Cabinet approval on Sunday to annex settlements and territory that would become part of Israel under the US plan.

But Jared Kushner — Trump’s adviser and son-in-law, who spearheaded the Middle East initiative — said that Washington does not want any moves made before Israel’s March 2 election.

Asked about the timing of any annexations in an interview with Gzero media, Kushner said: “The hope is they will wait until after the election.”

“We’ll start working on the technical stuff now, but I think we’d need an Israeli government in place in order to move forward,” he added.

Palestinian Chief Negotiator Saeb Erekat on Thursday called the plan “historic madness”.

He told journalists in Ramallah that President Mahmud Abbas had written to Netanyahu threatening to cut off security coordination if Trump’s plan goes ahead.

“We’ve told the Israelis the consequences of such an idea and they know it,” he said.

The Palestinians have made such threats multiple times before, without following through.

 

‘Miss of the century’ 

 

Netanyahu heads a caretaker government after failing to form a majority in coalition talks following two elections over the past year.

Likud is again neck-and-neck in the polls with the centrist Blue and White alliance led by ex-military chief Benny Gantz, and it remains unclear if either bloc will be able to form a government following a new election scheduled for March.

The Israeli premier also faces graft charges as he battles for reelection.

Netanyahu’s office declined to comment on whether the annexation issue was on the agenda for a Sunday Cabinet meeting.

The international community views Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank as illegal. An attempt to formally place them under Israeli sovereignty would likely trigger further global uproar.

Netanyahu was however facing calls from the Israeli right to act.

“Whatever will be delayed until after the election won’t ever happen. Everyone understands that,” Defence Minister Naftali Bennett said on Wednesday.

“If we delay or diminish applying sovereignty, the opportunity of the century will become the miss of the century.”

Netanyahu was in Moscow earlier on Thursday seeking to broaden international support for Israel’s ambitions.

Tourism Minister Yariv Levin, who was travelling with him, told army radio that the government wanted to move on annexation “as quickly as possible, in a number of days”.

Netanyahu again praised Trump’s initiative at the start of his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

The Russian leader did not mention the peace plan in his public remarks.

But Russian foreign spokeswoman Maria Zakharova told journalists that Moscow had only “begun to study” Trump’s 180-page plan, stressing that “the decision on issues of a long-term and fair peace agreement must belong to the Palestinians and Israelis themselves”.

Israel’s occupation forces announced on Wednesday that extra forces were deployed to the West Bank and around the Gaza Strip ahead of any further Palestinian demonstrations against the Trump plan.

An Israeli military official told AFP the deployment aimed “to minimise the risk of a flareup”.

But protests against the plan have been relatively muted.

The Palestinian Red Crescent said a total of 18 people were injured in the West Bank cities of Ramallah and Hebron on Thursday during demonstrations.

In Ramallah, Israeli forces fired rubber bullets and tear gas to disperse demonstrators. According to the Ramallah-based Palestinian Prisoners Club, 33 protesters have been arrested over the last 24 hours.

Police said they had decided to boost their forces in and around Jerusalem ahead of Friday Muslim prayers on the volatile Al Aqsa Mosque compound.

Iraq president gives parliament 3 days to name new PM

By - Jan 29,2020 - Last updated at Jan 29,2020

BAGHDAD — Iraq's president on Wednesday threatened to unilaterally name a successor to the country's premier, who resigned in December, if parliament did not nominate a candidate within three days.

"If the concerned blocs are unable to resolve the nomination issue by no later than Saturday, February 1... I see an obligation to exercise my constitutional powers by tasking whomever I find most acceptable to parliament and the people," Barham Saleh wrote in a letter seen by AFP.

Prime Minister Adel Abdel Mahdi resigned in December after two months of deadly protests against his government, but he has stayed on in a caretaker role, as deeply divided political parties have failed to agree on a replacement.

According to Iraq's constitution, parliament's largest bloc must nominate a prime minister within 15 days of legislative elections.

The candidate is then appointed by the president and tasked with forming a government within one month. 

But Iraq is in uncharted waters, as the constitution makes no provisions for the prime minister's resignation and the 15-day period since Abdel Mahdi stepped down has long expired.

Any candidate would need stamps of approval from not only the fractured political class, but also the Shiite religious authority, neighbouring Iran, its rival the US and the anti-government civil campaign that has gripped Iraq since October.

In late December, Saleh formally declined to nominate the governor of the oil-rich province of Basra, Assaad Al Aidani, saying he would be too "controversial".

Iraq has grown increasingly unstable since then, with protest-related violence killing more than 480 people and tensions between the US and Iran prompting each to carry out air strikes on Iraqi soil. 

Warning of even further deterioration, Saleh urged lawmakers to "resume constructive and serious political dialogue in order to agree on a new candidate for the premiership who has the people's approval".

"We believe that the biggest obstacle lies in reaching reasonable parameters to agree on a new candidate for prime minister. Continuing in this current situation is certainly impossible and risks making things more dangerous and complex," he wrote. 

Protests erupted in Iraq's capital and Shiite-majority south in October in outrage at rampant corruption and unemployment, quickly escalating to calls for the government to resign.

The unprecedented grassroots movement has scored partial wins with the premier's resignation and the passing of a new electoral law, but the bill failed to address many of their demands and Abdel Mahdi remains caretaker premier.

Possible successors that have been floated include an adviser to the president, an intelligence chief, political operatives and former top officials, among others.

Many have been rejected outright by the street, with protesters hanging up their portraits overlaid with large X marks and insisting on a politically independent candidate.

A senior government official told AFP that parties had been unable to reach a consensus because of the absence of two key brokers — Iranian general Qassem Soleimani and Iraqi commander Abu Mahdi Al Muhandis.

Both were killed in a US drone strike near Baghdad's international airport on January 3 that bolstered Iraqi factions' calls for US troops to leave the country. 

"Abu Mahdi and Soleimani both played a unifying role in times like this and no one has been able to fill that vacuum yet," the government official said. 

Trump peace plan embraced in Israel, rejected by Palestinians

'No! A thousand times No!'

By - Jan 29,2020 - Last updated at Jan 29,2020

A Palestinian demonstrator is detained by Israeli soldiers during a demonstration near the West Bank village of Tubas, near the Jordan Valley, on Wednesday, against the US President Donald Trump's peace proposals (AFP photo)

OCCUPIED JERUSALEM — President Donald Trump's long delayed Middle East peace plan won support in Israel on Wednesday but was bitterly rejected by Palestinians facing possible Israeli annexation of key parts of the West Bank. 

Trump, who unveiled the plan on Tuesday at the White House standing alongside Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with no Palestinian representatives on hand, said his initiative could succeed where others had failed.

Major powers and some regional players responded with caution, saying Trump's project deserves study while stressing that a durable solution to the conflict can only emerge through Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. 

But Trump's proposals reportedly included no Palestinian input and grants Israel much of what it has sought in decades of international diplomacy, namely control over Jerusalem as its "undivided" capital, rather than a city to share with the Palestinians.

It also offers a US green light for Israel to annex the strategically crucial Jordan Valley — which accounts for around 30 per cent of the West Bank — as well as other Israeli settlements in the area. 

“History knocked on our door last night and gave us a unique opportunity to apply Israeli law on all of the settlements in Judea [and] Samaria,” said Israel’s right-wing Defence Minister Naftali Bennett, using the Israeli term for the occupied West Bank. 

The Blue and White Party led by Benny Gantz, Netanyahu’s main election rival in March 2 polls, embraced Trump’s proposals as offering “a strong, viable basis for advancing a peace accord with the Palestinians”, in a statement late Tuesday. 

But the head of Israel’s left-wing coalition Labour-Gesher-Meretz, Amir Peretz, condemned Netanyahu’s expected move towards “unilateral annexations”.

 

Palestinian state? 

 

Trump’s proposal foresees the creation of a “contiguous” Palestinian state but under strict conditions, including a requirement that it be “demilitarised”.

On the flashpoint issue of Jerusalem, Trump said Israel should retain control over the city as its “undivided capital”.

At the same time, the Palestinians would be allowed to declare a capital in parts of East Jerusalem beyond an Israeli security wall, the plan said.

The US president also painted a future where some $50 billion in investments would eradicate the misery gripping Palestinians today.

But the Palestinians angrily rejected the entire plan.

“This conspiracy deal will not pass. Our people will take it to the dustbin of history,” Palestinian President Mahmud Abbas said.

The Hamas Islamist movement, which runs the Gaza Strip, said it could never accept compromise on Jerusalem being capital of a future state.

Near the town of Tubas in the Jordan Valley on Wednesday, protesters waved Palestinians flags as Israeli soldiers looked on. 

“If the Americans try to implement this plan the Palestinian people will make it fail,” said 63-year-old Khaled Sawafta.

A headline in the Palestinian daily newspaper Al Hayat Al Jadida summed up the sentiment. 

“No! A thousand times No!” it read. 

 

Mixed international reaction 

 

International reaction was at best cautiously positive.

The French foreign ministry on Wednesday welcomed Trump’s “efforts” and pledged to “carefully study” his proposal.

British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab called it a “serious proposal”.

Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, however, tore into Trump’s deal as “completely unacceptable”.

The ambassadors from three Arab nations — Oman, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain — were at the White House, providing some evidence of Trump’s claim to have growing support around the region.

Saudi Arabia said it “appreciates” Trump’s efforts and called for direct Israeli-Palestinian talks.

Russia, a growing force in Mideast politics, sounded sceptical.

“We do not know if the American proposal is mutually acceptable or not,” Deputy Foreign Minister Mikhail Bogdanov told Russian news agencies.

Netanyahu was due in Moscow on Wednesday to present the plan in person to President Vladimir Putin.

 

Impeachment, indictment 

 

Trump himself is in the midst of an impeachment battle over his alleged abuse of power and he faces a difficult reelection campaign in November.

Pro-Israel evangelical Christians form a key part of his voter base and they have backed his frequent moves to bolster Israel’s position in the Middle East.

Netanyahu was formally indicted on three corruption charges on Tuesday after he abandoned an attempt to seek parliamentary immunity.

His right-wing Likud faces a neck-and-neck race with rival Gantz’s centrist Blue and White in a month, with Netanyahu seemingly gambling that his high-profile partnership with Trump will galvanise his support.

Syrian army says it retakes key northwest town

By - Jan 29,2020 - Last updated at Jan 29,2020

This handout photo released by the official Syrian Arab News Agency on Tuesday shows Syrian army soldiers passing through the captured villages of Deir Sharqi and Talmans on the eastern outskirts of Maaret Al Numan in Syria's northernwestern province of Idlib (AFP photo)

BEIRUT — Syrian government forces recaptured a strategic northwestern highway town from extremist and allied rebels Wednesday, in the latest blow to the country's last major opposition bastion.

Maaret Al Numan lies on a key highway connecting the capital Damascus to second city Aleppo.

The M5 artery has long been in the sights of the government as it seeks to revive a moribund economy ravaged by almost nine years of war.

"Our forces managed in the past few days to stamp out terrorism in many villages and towns," including Maaret Al Numan, an army spokesman said.

The region, which hosts some three million people, is dominated by extremists from Syria's former Al Qaeda affiliate, but allied rebels are also present.

The government has slowly chipped away at the south of the bastion, despite several deals between government ally Russia and rebel backer Turkey intended to avert a broad military offensive.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan accused Moscow on Wednesday of "not honouring these agreements". 

It was a rare critical remark from Erdogan who has largely sought to keep good relations with Russian President Vladimir Putin since a 2016 rapprochement.

 

'Even greater catastrophe' 

 

Tens of thousands of civilians have fled the government's advance on the south of the province in recent weeks, seeking safety closer to the Turkish border further north.

The violence in the northwest has displaced more than 388,000 civilians since December, the United Nations says.

At least 20,000 of them have moved in the last two days, said UN Undersecretary General for Humanitarian Affairs Mark Lowcock on Wednesday. 

“Unless the current hostilities stop, we will see an even greater humanitarian catastrophe,” he told the UN Security Council.

Aid groups have warned the latest violence is compounding one of the worst humanitarian disasters of the nine-year war.

The Syrian army, which now control around 70 per cent of Syria, have repeatedly vowed to retake the entire country, including Idlib.

After Maaret Al Numan’s recapture, the Syrian army was bent on continuing the fight “until all Syrian soil has been cleansed of terrorism”, it said in a statement.

On Wednesday, loyalist forces swept the town for booby traps and unexploded ordnance after all rebels were either killed or withdrew, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said.

 

Mosaics museum 

 

The town was once a defiant hotspot for anti-Assad protests, drawing in crowds from surrounding villages, but today its streets are largely empty.

It is home to a museum of Roman and Byzantine-era mosaics, which volunteers sought to protect with sandbags through years of war.

What remains of rebel-held territory includes more than half of Idlib province, as well as slivers of adjacent Aleppo and Latakia.

The Syrian army and rebels were locked in clashes in the south of Aleppo province on Wednesday, the Britain-based observatory said.

State news agency SANA said the army on Wednesday gained ground against rebels and extremists in the al-Rashideen area in the province’s west.

To the north of Maaret Al Numan, the front line had been pushed back to within 10 kilometres of Saraqeb, the next town on the M5 highway, its director Rami Abdel Rahman said.

The army has recaptured around 27 towns and villages from their rivals in southern Idlib since January 24. 

Iraq weighs larger NATO role to replace US-led coalition

By - Jan 29,2020 - Last updated at Jan 29,2020

Thousands of Iraqi men, women and children of all ages massed in Baghdad to demand US troops leave the country (AFP photo)

BAGHDAD — Iraq is considering a larger role for NATO at the expense of the US-led coalition, Iraqi and Western officials told AFP, after an American drone strike on Baghdad that sparked outrage.

The January 3 strike which killed Iranian General Qasem Soleimani and a top Iraqi commander was condemned by Baghdad as a breach of its sovereignty and of the coalition's mandate, which focuses on fighting the Daesh terror group.

Iraq's parliament swiftly voted in favour of ousting all foreign troops — including the 5,200 US soldiers — and the coalition's anti-Daesh operations were indefinitely suspended.

Fearing a swift withdrawal could be destabilising, Iraqi and Western officials have begun discussing changes to the coalition's role, according to local officials and diplomats.

"We are talking to the coalition countries — France, the UK, Canada — about a range of scenarios," said Abdelkarim Khalaf, spokesman for Prime Minister Adel Abdel Mahdi.

"The essential thing is that no combat troops are present and our airspace is no longer used," Khalaf told AFP.

Two Western officials said the premier had asked them to "draft some options" on a path forward for the coalition.

These options had been submitted directly to the premier.

They included a coalition not led by the US, an amended mandate with limits to coalition activities or an expanded role for NATO's separate mission in Iraq.

The Canadian-led NATO mission was set up in 2018 and has around 500 forces training Iraqi troops, although its operations have also been on hold since the US strike.

By comparison, the US-led coalition established in 2014 has up to 8,000 troops in Iraq, the bulk of them American forces.

Khalaf told AFP that a larger role for NATO was one of several options being discussed.

 

A compromise ahead 

 

One of the Western officials said "the NATO option" has won initial nods of approval from the prime minister, the military and even anti-US elements of the powerful Hashed Al Shaabi military network.

"I expect it will end with some sort of compromise — a smaller presence under a different title," he said.

"The Americans will still be able to fight [Daesh] and the Iraqis can claim they kicked [the US] out."

The various options were expected to be laid out at a meeting Wednesday between Iraq and NATO in Amman and again next month by NATO's defence ministers.

"But there is recognition among the Europeans that there needs to be US buy-in to whatever happens next," the Western official said.

Following parliament's vote, Abdel Mahdi invited the US to send a delegation to Baghdad to discuss a withdrawal, but the State Department declined.

US President Donald Trump himself has said he wants NATO to play a larger role in the region.

His special envoy to the coalition, James Jeffrey, hinted at a shift last week although he said talks were in "a very early stage".

"So there may be a shift between — at some point, hypothetically — between the number of forces under the NATO rubric and the number of forces under the coalition," he told reporters on January 23.

NATO, whose mandate in Iraq is renewed yearly, has insisted any broader role would only involve training and an official from the alliance said there was "no discussion" of a combat role.

"There have been discussions between allies, and a lot of contact between NATO and the government of Iraq in the last couple of weeks," a NATO official told AFP. 

 

'It's a trial run' 

 

Since Iraq declared Daesh defeated in late 2017, coalition forces have focused on conducting air strikes and surveillance to rout extremist sleeper cells.

Beginning last year, the coalition prepared plans for a troop drawdown in Iraq, two senior US defence officials said, adding that a smaller footprint would "absolutely" still be able to keep pressure on Daesh.

It was forced to "speed up that plan" in the wake of escalating Iran-US tensions, one of the officials said.

Since October, nearly 20 rocket attacks have targeted the US embassy in Baghdad or Iraqi bases hosting American forces, killing one US contractor and an Iraqi soldier.

While no one has claimed responsibility, Washington has blamed Iran-aligned factions.

Both the coalition and NATO paused operations and pulled hundreds of personnel from bases across Iraq earlier this month.

Iraqi forces have filled the gap left by the force relocation, conducting surveillance missions and air strikes on their own after years of the coalition taking the lead.

"It's a de facto downsizing. It's a trial run," the first US official said. 

"That's ultimately what we've been striving for. We're looking at what it would be like if we weren't here." 

Lebanon crisis fuels brain drain

By - Jan 29,2020 - Last updated at Jan 29,2020

People are pictured inside the terminal at Beirut International Airport, on January 27 (AFP photo)

 

BEIRUT — When Lebanon's protests erupted in October, thousands found a renewed commitment to their homeland and vowed to fix a country that has long fed its best and brightest to the diaspora.

Then the economy unravelled.

Students and young professionals who had mobilised en masse to demand better opportunities in their home country started filling in immigration forms and applying to universities abroad.

Mothers on bustling protest squares who had been complaining about their children living far away have since seen even more leave.

With no clear path out of Lebanon's worst economic crisis in decades, the will to remain has petered out and many are now scrambling for the exit.

"I'm leaving and I'm never coming back," said Youssef Nassar, a 29-year-old cinematographer who has booked a one-way ticket to Canada for next month.

"Nothing is going right in this country for me to stay here."

Lebanon is suffering its worst economic crisis since the 1975-1990 civil war and everyone is feeling the heat.

Scores of companies have closed, salaries have been slashed, and unemployment rates are skyrocketing.

Inflation doubled between October and November, according to Lebanon's Blominvest Bank, while the Lebanese pound has plunged by a third against the dollar in the parallel exchange market.

Nassar criticised the political class for failing to chart a way out of the crisis.

"I have developed a hate for this country," he said.

'Won't wait forever' 

 

Nassar used to make a decent earning every month from shooting photo and video campaigns for fashion brands, advertising agencies and even English rock artist Steven Wilson. 

But since Lebanon's economic crisis accelerated with the start of anti-government protests in October, with banks temporarily closing and later severely limiting withdrawals, he has only been booked once.

Seven of his clients, including a high-profile member of the Lebanese parliament, have so far failed to pay the $25,000 they collectively owe him for previous projects.

"I want to work on my career and my future," said Nassar, who holds a Canadian passport.

"I'm not willing to wait forever for the country to get better."

He is not the only one seeking better chances abroad.

Information International, an independent Lebanon-based research body, estimates that the number of Lebanese who left the country and did not return in 2019 jumped by 42 per cent on the previous year.

Google searches from within Lebanon for the term "immigration" hit a five-year peak between November and December, according to Google Trends.

The last time the search term was that popular was right after Lebanon's 2006 war with Israel.

Immigration lawyers, for their part, say business is booming.

"Demand is up by at least 75 per cent," said one immigration lawyer who asked not to be named to protect his business.

He said he is currently processing 25 applications.

Most are to Canada, which along with Australia is among the most popular destinations for Lebanese emigrants due to their demand for highly skilled people, the lawyer said. 

The bulk of his clients are educated youths and young professionals working in pharmaceuticals, information technology and finance.

"They are leaving because of the economic and political situation," he told AFP.

 

'Tired of fighting' 

 

Decades of conflict, sluggish growth and corruption have prompted many Lebanese to emigrate — a fact touted by Lebanese officials who boast the success of the country's expatriates.

Although there are no official figures, Lebanon's diaspora is estimated to be more than double the size of its domestic population of four million.

This chronic exodus has drawn the ire of demonstrators, who accuse politicians they view as corrupt of hijacking the country and forcing its people out.

"I had been thinking about leaving ever since I was 16 years old," said Fatima, an architect by training who is now 28.

"When the revolution started, that was the very first time I ever felt like I belonged, the very first time I ever felt that Lebanon's flag meant something to me."

But last month, Fatima lost a high-paying job at an international NGO after donors cut funding due to the crisis.

"This is when everything changed for me," she told AFP.

She found an immigration lawyer and is in the process of applying to emigrate to Canada — something she is determined to complete.

"I'm tired of fighting all the time," she said.

"I don't think I will be failing my country if I leave," she added.

"I will be failing it if I stay and get more depressed and do nothing."

US troops injured in Iran missile strike rises to 50 — Pentagon

By - Jan 29,2020 - Last updated at Jan 29,2020

WASHINGTON — The number of US troops injured by an Iranian missile strike in Iraq this month has risen to 50, according to new figures released by the Pentagon on Tuesday.

The personnel have been diagnosed with traumatic brain injury (TBI), Lieutenant Colonel Thomas Campbell, a Pentagon spokesman, said in a statement.

The military had said on Friday that 34 troops were injured in the strike on the Ain Al Asad base in western Iraq on January 8.

President Donald Trump had initially said no Americans were hurt by the missiles, and Democrats later accused him of trying to downplay the injuries.

Iran fired on Iraqi bases housing US troops in retaliation for an American drone attack that killed Iranian commander Qasem Soleimani in Baghdad, raising fears of war.

Campbell said that of the 50, 31 were treated in Iraq and returned to duty while 18 were being evaluated in Germany. Another was transported to Kuwait and has already returned to duty, he said, adding that the numbers could still change.

At the time of the strike most of the 1,500 US soldiers at the base had been in bunkers, after advance warning from superiors.

Syrian army recaptures most of key rebel-held town

By - Jan 28,2020 - Last updated at Jan 28,2020

This handout photo released by the official Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA) on Monday reportedly shows Syrian soldiers gesturing on top of a tank while operating in the northern Aleppo province (AFP photo)

BEIRUT — The Syrian army on Tuesday recaptured most of Maaret Al Numan, a semi-deserted town of symbolic and strategic importance in Syria's last major rebel-held bastion, state media and a war monitor said.

"The Syrian army has retaken most neighbourhoods in Maaret Al Numan" and are now combing recaptured areas, said state news agency SANA, shortly after Damascus loyalists first entered the town in the northwest province of Idlib.

The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said that most rebels and extremists had pulled out after the army stormed the town from multiple fronts earlier in the day.

It said regime forces were left battling the few fighters that remained holed-up in the area, which has been under opposition control since 2012.

Maaret Al Numan, which is nearly deserted after months of bombardment, lies on the M5 highway linking Damascus to Syria’s second city Aleppo, a main artery coveted by the regime as it tries to rekindle a moribund economy.

It is also the second biggest urban centre in the beleaguered opposition bastion of Idlib.

Its recapture would bring the army a step closer to taking full control of the wider extremist-run bastion and the M5 highway that runs through it.

The army’s advance is part of a multipronged push in northwest Syria, dominated by extremists of the Hayat Tahrir Al Sham alliance and their rebel allies.

The violence has displaced around 358,000 people in Syria’s northwest since December, the United Nations says.

Misty Buswell of the International Rescue Committee warned that the latest escalation “will only add to the humanitarian catastrophe that is already unfolding”.

The Idlib region is home to three million people, half of whom have already been displaced from other parts of the country.

The latest push to retake Maarat Al Numan coincides with battles between the Syrian army and extremists in the west of Aleppo province, a rebel-held area that in mid-January became the latest front of fighting in northwest Syria.

Trump unveils Mideast plan, hailing 'big step towards peace'

By - Jan 28,2020 - Last updated at Jan 28,2020

A Palestinian protester shouts slogans during a demonstration against US President Donald Trump's peace plan in the West Bank city of Ramallah on Tuesday (AFP photo)

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump on Tuesday unveiled long-awaited details of a US plan for solving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, warning it may represent the last chance at statehood for the Palestinians.

"Today, Israel takes a big step towards peace," Trump told a White House news conference, standing alongside visiting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as he revealed key points of the plan already strongly rejected by the Palestinians.

"My vision presents a win-win opportunity for both sides, a realistic two state solution that resolves the risk of Palestinian statehood to Israel's security," Trump said.

The plan was warmly welcomed by Israel’s prime minister, who called it a “historic day” for Israel.

The plan, Trump said, proposes a four-year freeze of Israeli development in the area eyed for a future Palestinian state.

“Jerusalem will remain Israel’s undivided, very important, undivided capital,” Trump stressed.

But the plan would also provide the Palestinians with a capital in occupied East Jerusalem, he said, while indicating that the West Bank would not be cut in half under the plan.

“We will also work to create a contiguous territory within the future Palestinian state, for when the conditions for statehood are met, including the firm rejection of terrorism,” Trump said as he called on the Palestinians to turn their back on the radical Hamas movement.

Calling it a “historic opportunity” for the Palestinians to achieve an independent state, Trump said he had written Tuesday to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to enlist his support for the plan.

“President Abbas,” Trump said, “I want you to know if you choose the path to peace, America and many other countries, we will be there, we will be there to help you in so many different ways.”

No Palestinian official was present at the launch although the ambassadors from three Arab nations — Oman, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain — were at the White House.

“I explained to [Abbas] that the territory allocated for his new state will remain open and undeveloped for a period of four years,” Trump said.

“This could be the last opportunity they will ever have.”

“Palestinians are in poverty and violence, exploited by those seeking to use them as pawns to advance terrorism and extremism,” the president added.

“They deserve a far better life.”

Palestinians reject Trump peace plan

Our people will take it to the dustbin of history — Abbas

By - Jan 28,2020 - Last updated at Jan 28,2020

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas gestures as he delivers a speech in the West Bank city of Ramallah on Tuesday, following the announcement by US President Donald Trump of the Mideast peace plan (AFP photo)

RAMALLAH — Palestinian leaders on Tuesday rejected US President Donald Trump's peace proposal as an unacceptable capitulation to Israel that tramples on the long-standing aspirations of their people.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas vowed the initiative unveiled in Washington would fail.

"This conspiracy deal will not pass. Our people will take it to the dustbin of history," he said after a meeting in the West Bank city of Ramallah of various Palestinian factions including Islamist group Hamas, which pledged to "resist the deal in all its forms". 

Trump's proposal included a long list of measures directly in line with Israeli interests, notably recognition of Jerusalem as the "undivided capital" of Israel.

"If Jerusalem is not the capital of the Palestinian state, how will we accept that?" Abbas asked, stressing that it was "impossible for any child, Arab, Muslim or Christian," to do so.

Senior Hamas official Khalil Al Hayya said the Islamist group which controls Gaza would never "accept any substitute for Jerusalem as the capital of the Palestinian state".

"We warn the whole world not to go along with this deal," he said.

Trump's plan triggered immediate condemnation on the streets of the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, with demonstrations expected to continue through the week. 

Thirteen people were wounded in the West Bank in confrontations with the Israeli forces on Tuesday, the Red Crescent said.

One person was taken to hospital after being hit with a rubber bullet, while 12 others were suffering from exposure to tear gas, a spokeswoman said. 

An AFP reporter said around 200 Palestinians confronted Israeli forces near Ramallah, burning photos of Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Pages

Pages



Newsletter

Get top stories and blog posts emailed to you each day.

PDF