You are here

Saudi Arabia-Canada row

Aug 08,2018 - Last updated at Aug 08,2018

The ranting between Canada and Saudi Arabia over alleged human rights violations against human rights activists and defenders of women's rights in Saudi Arabia could have been avoided altogether had Ottawa followed the normal procedure to channel its concerns.

Countries cannot go about charging other countries with human rights violations on their own, without first airing them before a proper and recognised human rights fora. No country can be a judge of human rights issues on its own. Had Canada raised the issue before a UN human rights body first in order to ascertain the validity of its charges and then receive endorsement of its concerns by the majority of member states, then Riyadh probably would not had complained.

Ottawa cannot be the accuser and the judge all on its own. Only the proper international fora can be the arbiters over such serious issues. Against this backdrop, Ottawa erred by bypassing international human rights bodies in order to investigate its concerns judiciously first before escalating its stand-off with Riyadh.

It is never too late to correct this mistake and Ottawa should take the initiative in correcting its posture against Saudi Arabia for allegedly violating civil rights in the country. Women’s human rights are always sensitive and given the conflicting cultures and religions in the world, making judgements on women rights is a very sensitive issue.

That said, the international community has successfully adopted basic human rights standards concerning women living under different cultures. These guidelines were considered and adopted in the presence of representatives of most countries of the world. Various religious and cultural values were taken on board during the debate on them.

Countries that differ with the majority view can of course enter a reservation on a particular language, provided that this reservation does not interfere with the substance and objective of the human rights code. This way Riyadh could have saved itself from wild complaints and Ottawa could have avoided a major diplomatic row with Riyadh.

up
34 users have voted.

Comments

Amazing, sad and unbelievable. Has Jordan sold its soul for such cheap costs

THIS IS THE VERY FIRST JORDAN TIMES EDITORIAL THAT I DO NOT AGREE WITH. YES, SAUDI HAS THE RIGHT TO THEIR WAYS OF LIFE BUT SHOULD NOT INCLUDE ALL INTERNATIONAL LAWS. WE HAVE SANCTIONS ON IRAN, SYRIA, HAMAS AND THE LIST GOES ON BECAUSE OF HUMAN RIGHT ABUSES. ARE WE THE JUDGE AND THE JURRY? NO BUT WE CAN NOT STAD BY AND WATCH ANY FORM OF HUMAN RIGHT ABUSES BECAUSE MANY COUNTRIES THAT DOES ANY FORM OF BUSINESS WITH OTHER COUNTRIES HAS THIS CLAUSE ATTACHED TO THEIR RULES IF NOT CONSTITUTION. CANADA HAS THE RIGHT TO SPEAK OUT JUST LIKE WE DO IN USA. TO REQUEST THAT CANADA APPOLOGISE FOR THIS IS AN INSULT AND ASSULT ON ALL THE INTERNATIONAL NORMS. TO STATE THAT HUMAN RIGHTS OF WOMEN ARE VERY SENSITIVE ISSUE IS AN INSULT OF THE FIRST ORDER. NO WONDER THAT JORDAN HAS ADAMANLY IGNORED THEIR PRACTICES OF NOT ALLOWING JORDANIAN WOMEN MARRIED TO NON JORDANIAN MEN THE SAME BASIC RIGHTS AS JORDANIAN MEN MARRIED TO NON JORDANIAN WOMEN. JORDAN TIMES IS WRONG ON THIS ONE. WHAT KIND OF WORLD ARE WE CREATING AND WHY DO WE FOCUS ON SOME COUNRIES AND TURN BLIND EYES ON OTHERS. THE ARAB WORLD SHOULD GET USE TO IT THAT WOMEN AND GIRLS ARE NOT ANY PERSON'S PROPERTY AND SHOULD NEVER BE TREATED LIKE AN EGG SHELLS. IF CANADA SHOULD GO ON THEIR KNEES AS WE WANTED KATAR TO DO, WE MUST ALSO GO ON OUR KNEES TO IRAN, AND SYRIA TO MENTION BUT TWO. THE WHOLE ISSUE IS SHOCKING ESPECIALLY HOW IT IS LINKED TO WOMEN RIGHTS.

Add new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
10 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Newsletter

Get top stories and blog posts emailed to you each day.