You are here

Region

Region section

Rare exchange of fire between Israeli forces and Palestinian security

By - Jun 12,2019 - Last updated at Jun 12,2019

This photo shows bullet holes at the Palestinian Authority security apparatus headquarters in Nablus, in the occupied West Bank, on Tuesday (AFP photo)

NABLUS, Palestinian Territories — Israeli troops exchanged fire with Palestinian security forces in the occupied West Bank on Tuesday in a rare shootout Israeli forces claimed was the result of mistaken identity.

The Palestinian governor of Nablus, Ibrahim Ramadan, said that two members of the Palestinian security forces were lightly wounded in the incident in the early hours of the morning adjacent to their headquarters.

He told reporters the Israelis claimed they came under fire first and then responded by shooting at the headquarters building, but questioned why they were there in the first place.

“Where is the headquarters? It is in central Nablus,” he said outside the facility, where a number of windows were shattered.

“What is the Israeli army doing in Nablus? What are they doing near the headquarters? There was no coordination on this matter,” he said.

“This is unacceptable.”

Israeli forces said in a statement that the troops were on an operation to round up suspected Palestinians when they opened fire at what turned out to be the wrong target.

“Exchanges of fire broke out between [troops] and those identified by the force as suspects. In retrospect, it turned out that these were members of Palestinian security forces,” it said.

“There are no casualties to our forces. The incident will be investigated,” it added.

Under the Oslo peace accords between Israel and the Palestinians, Nablus, in the northern West Bank, is designated as being under full Palestinian security and administrative rule.

But as in other ostensibly autonomous Palestinian areas, Israel regularly sends its forces in whenever it deems it necessary.

US says Iran is in breach of nuclear deal but repeats offer of talks

By - Jun 12,2019 - Last updated at Jun 12,2019

VIENNA — The United States said on Tuesday that Iran's work with advanced centrifuges is a breach of the nuclear deal Washington has already pulled out of, expressing its concern while repeating that it is open to holding talks with Tehran.

In a statement to a quarterly meeting of the UN nuclear watchdog's 35-nation Board of Governors, the United States also said Tehran's acceleration of uranium enrichment would not lead to Washington backing down in its policy of trying to isolate Iran.

"Attempting to generate negotiating leverage 1 kg of uranium at a time will not bring sanctions relief," US Ambassador Jackie Wolcott said in her statement to the board.

The landmark 2015 deal between Iran and major powers allows Tehran to operate thousands of first-generation IR-1 centrifuges — machines that enrich uranium — but puts much stricter limits on more advanced models.

A quarterly report by the International Atomic Energy Agency, which is policing the deal, last month said Iran had installed up to 33 IR-6 centrifuges, although only 10 had been tested with uranium hexafluoride feedstock so far. 

The deal allows Iran to “test” up to 30, but only after eight-and-a-half years have passed. How many Iran can currently test and how is a “grey area”, Western diplomats say, adding that it would be crossing a red line if it fed uranium feedstock into all of them.

The IAEA has declined to say whether Iran is complying with its obligations, adding that it is up to the parties in the agreement to decide that.

Wolcott took a stricter view of Iran’s compliance with the deal, known officially as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

“Iran has claimed that it continues to comply with the JCPOA, but it is now reported to be in clear violation of the deal. This should be of great concern to all of us,” she said.

Since her country is no longer part of the deal, however, she called on the remaining parties — which together with Iran meet in a format known as the Joint Commission — to take action.

“The United States calls on Iran to return to compliance without delay. We understand the JCPOA Joint Commission is treating this issue with the seriousness it deserves, and we urge the JCPOA participants to address this issue as soon as possible,” she added.

Wolcott also repeated that Washington remains open to talks with Iran aimed at reaching a “comprehensive deal” and ending its “destabilising behaviours” in the region. Iran has dismissed such offers.

Sudan businesses shut as protesters keep up civil disobedience

By - Jun 12,2019 - Last updated at Jun 12,2019

Sudanese residents walk in the central market of Khartoum on Monday, as most of the shops and businesses remained shut (AFP photo)

KHARTOUM — A protest strike kept most businesses shut and residents hunkered indoors in the Sudanese capital Tuesday as a top US diplomat prepared a visit to press the ruling generals to halt a bloody crackdown.

Protest leaders stepped up the pressure on the generals by announcing they would soon release a list of members for a new ruling body — the key point of dispute between the two sides.

Most shops and businesses remained closed on the third day of a civil disobedience campaign launched by protest leaders after a crackdown on a weeks-long sit-in left dozens dead on June 3.

Public buses were operating in some parts of Khartoum and some neighbourhood vegetable markets were open, an AFP correspondent reported.

But the capital's main business and commercial districts were shut with some companies extending to the end of the week the Eid Al Fitr holidays marking the end of Ramadan.

The paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) accused of having played the lead role in the June 3 crackdown patrolled districts in their trademark pickup trucks fitted with heavy machineguns.

"We are now getting used to live with guns as we are seeing so many of these men walking into restaurants with their weapons," one resident said as a group of RSF members entered an eatery.

Fewer people were on the streets than usual.

"In the last three days, we have lost a lot of money," said Ibrahim Omar, an employee at one of many tour firms hit hard by a nationwide internet blackout on Monday.

"We are not doing any international flight bookings. I hope it does not continue like this."

In the northern district of Bahari, a hotbed of unrest where protesters had put had roadblocks in the past few weeks, most shops were closed but there were no barricades to be seen, an AFP corespondent reported.

Demonstrators declared their nationwide shutdown a success.

“This shows clearly what we can do, and also in a peaceful way,” said Ishraga Mohamed.

“Such a campaign does not lead to killing people and at the same time puts pressure on the military council. We will continue with it until our goal is achieved.”

Protest leaders vowed to name a new ruling body to replace the generals.

“The Alliance for Freedom and Change (AFC) will reveal its sovereign council and a prime minister in an announcement to be made at a suitable time,” the Sudanese Professionals Association, a key member of the umbrella protest movement, said late on Monday.

The crackdown by the military came after negotiations between protest leaders and the generals collapsed late last month over who should lead the new governing body — a civilian or a soldier.

The AFC said the campaign of civil disobedience “clearly shows that the Sudanese people are rejecting the military council and its militias and they have lost their legitimacy”.

Since toppling longtime president Omar Al Bashir on April 11, the generals have resisted demonstrators’ demands, backed by Western and most African governments, to make way for a civilian-led transition.

 

US call to stop attacks 

 

The US assistant secretary of state for African affairs, Tibor Nagy, plans to meet both the generals and protest leaders in Khartoum, the State Department said.

He is to leave on the trip on Wednesday and also visit Addis Ababa to discuss the Sudan crisis with Ethiopian leaders and the African Union.

“He will call for a cessation of attacks against civilians and urge parties to work toward creating an enabling environment” for talks to resume, the State Department said.

The United States has led calls for a civilian-led transition even as its Arab allies Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have backed the generals.

The military-led government has blamed deteriorating conditions in Khartoum on the protesters’ disobedience campaign.

“We are appealing to those who blocked the roads to open them for all the sick people... since many people lost their lives because they cannot reach the hospital,” senior health ministry official Mohamed Altom told reporters during a tour organised by the ministry.

The generals said they would send in security reinforcements.

“The military council has decided to reinforce the presence of armed forces, RSF and other regular forces to help normal life return,” a general said late on Sunday.

But many residents back the protesters’ demands.

“The military council should hand over the government to civilians as nobody wants the military to rule... people don’t like them,” said Ahmed Abdallah, a resident of an upscale Khartoum neighbourhood.

UN council backs embattled Yemen envoy

By - Jun 12,2019 - Last updated at Jun 12,2019

A Yemeni fisherman prepares his catch to sell in a market in the embattled Red Sea port city of Hodeida on Tuesday (AFP photo)

UNITED NATIONS, United States — The UN Security Council on Monday expressed full support for the UN envoy for Yemen after he came under sharp criticism from Yemen's president.

The dispute threatened to derail fragile efforts to implement a ceasefire truce agreed in December in Sweden.

In a statement, council members "underlined their full support" for envoy Martin Griffiths and "called on the parties to engage constructively and continuously" with him.

The statement followed talks in Riyadh between UN political chief Rosemary DiCarlo with the Saudi foreign minister and with President Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi, the Saudi-backed leader of Yemen, to try to defuse the row. 

Saudi Foreign Minister Ibrahim Al Assaf and Abdel Aziz Hamad Aluwaisheg from the Gulf Cooperation Council "both expressed their support for the work of the United Nations in Yemen and for the efforts of the special envoy," said UN spokesperson Eri Kaneko.

DiCarlo, the UN undersecretary general for political affairs, also held “productive” talks with Hadi, a UN statement said, without providing details.

The UN Security Council is due to discuss Yemen on June 17.

Hadi has accused Griffiths of siding with the Houthi rebels, telling UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres in a letter last month that he “can no longer accept these offenses” by the envoy.

The president has taken issue with Griffiths over the rebel handover last month of ports to a “coast guard” that the government says is in fact rebel fighters in different uniforms.

Successive UN envoys to Yemen have grappled with disagreements from both sides in their efforts to end the devastating war.

British diplomat Griffiths was appointed in February 2018, replacing Ismail Ould Cheikh Ahmed of Mauritania after the Houthis broke off ties with him. 

His predecessor, Jamal Benomar, quit in 2015 after a Saudi-led military coalition intervened in Yemen to push back the Iran-aligned Houthis, who continue to hold the capital, Sanaa.

The conflict, which has killed tens of thousands of people, has had a devastating toll on civilians and triggered the world’s worst humanitarian crisis, according to the United Nations.

Israeli court approves Jerusalem church land sale to settler group

Greek Orthodox Archbishop describes decision as ‘illegal and illegitimate’

By - Jun 12,2019 - Last updated at Jun 12,2019

This photo taken on Tuesday shows a view of the Petra hostel in the Old City of Jerusalem near the Jaffa Gate (AFP photo)

OCCUPIED JERUSALEM — Israel's top court gave final approval for the 2004 alleged sale of properties by the Greek Orthodox Church to a Jewish pro-settlement organisation in mainly Palestinian areas of annexed East Jerusalem.

In its ruling on Monday, the supreme court rejected the church's appeal against a district court's 2017 approval of the same deal. 

Three companies linked to a group named Ateret Cohanim in 2004 secured the long-term lease of three buildings owned by the Greek Orthodox Church — the Petra hostel and the New Imperial Hotel, both located by the Jaffa Gate, and a residential building in the Muslim Quarter.

Ateret Cohanim works to "Judaise" East Jerusalem in its entirety by purchasing real estate in the city's Palestinian areas through front companies.

The deal made Ateret Cohanim the owner of the majority of the properties between the Old City's Jaffa Gate and Arab market.

A source close to the Greek Orthodox patriarchy of the early 2000's told AFP in 2017 that the church was unaware of the land sale. 

The church asserts that the deal, conducted in 2004, was conducted illegally, and said in 2017 after Israel’s Jerusalem District Court ruled against it that the court “disregarded the Patriarchate's clear and concrete legal evidence proving bad faith, bribery and conspiracy”.

In a statement on Tuesday, Palestinian Greek Orthodox Archbishop Atallah Hanna described the supreme court's decision as "illegal and illegitimate".

“The seizure of the historic Jaffa Gate properties by extremist settler organisations is a new catastrophe to the misfortunes suffered by the Christians in this Holy City,” he said, calling for the deal to be cancelled in a lawful manner.

The Greek Orthodox Church is the largest and wealthiest church in the Holy Land.

Israel took over mainly Palestinian East Jerusalem in the 1967 war and later annexed it in a move never recognised by the international community.

The Palestinians envisage East Jerusalem, which includes the Old City, as the capital of their future state.

Some 320,000 Palestinians live in East Jerusalem, while the Israeli settler population there has grown to 210,000.

The Jerusalem district court had dealt with claims against the deal for nine years before approving it. 

The supreme court said the earlier ruling was sound and “the appeal is rejected”.

Migrants stranded off Tunisia as ’centres overcrowded’

By - Jun 11,2019 - Last updated at Jun 11,2019

A file photo showing a deflated rubber boat in seen at the sea, after the Libyan coast guard intercepted migrants aboard, some 25km off the Libyan coast, on May 8, 2018 (AFP photo)

TUNIS — A rescue boat carrying around 75 migrants, most of them from Bangladesh, has been stuck off Tunisia for 12 days after authorities refused to let them disembark, the Red Crescent said on Tuesday.

The Egyptian boat rescued the migrants in Tunisian waters, but authorities in the governorate of Medinine say its migrant centres are too overcrowded to allow them to come ashore, leaving the vessel 25km from the coastal city of Zarzis.

A government source said the migrants had refused food and medical aid and were demanding that they be allowed to cross into Europe — their likely target, hoping to reach the chance of a better life, when they set off.

Red Crescent official Mongi Slim said doctors had reached the boat to provide some medical help, but others had repeatedly refused any aid.

"After 12 days at sea, the migrants are in a bad condition," he told Reuters.

Among the group who set off from Libya, 64 are from Bangladesh and the rest are from Morocco, Sudan and Egypt, the Red Crescent said. The details of their rescue were not immediately clear.

Neighbouring Libya's west coast is a main departure point for African migrants hoping to reach Europe by paying human traffickers, though numbers have dropped due to an Italian-led effort to disrupt smuggling networks and support the Libyan coast guard.

At least 65 migrants drowned last month when their boat capsized in the Mediterranean Sea off the Tunisian coast after they had left Libya hoping to reach Europe.

In the first four months of 2019, 164 people are known to have died on the route, a smaller number but a higher death rate than in previous years, with one dying for every three who reach European shores, the UN refugee agency UNHCR said.

Algeria car tycoon associates probed for graft— prosecutor

By - Jun 11,2019 - Last updated at Jun 11,2019

Students hold their national flag as they demonstrate in Algiers on Tuesday, two days after a vote planned for July 4 was cancelled (AFP photo)

ALGIERS — A prosecutor said on Tuesday that 45 people including senior officials connected to Algerian automobile tycoon Mahieddine Tahkout are under investigation for corruption and money laundering.

Of 56 persons of interest in the case, 45 are under judicial investigation, the Algiers prosecutor said in a statement broadcast by state television.

The investigating judge had "decided to place 19 of the accused in provisional detention and to conditionally release seven" suspects, the statement said.

The 19 others under investigation remained free without restrictions, it added.

A lawyer for Tahkout told AFP on Monday that the tycoon had been placed in provisional detention on corruption allegations.

Tahkout is a close associate of longtime leader Abdelaziz Bouteflika, who was forced to step down in April after weeks of mass protests.

Demonstrations have continued since the ailing president stepped down, as protesters demand that regime insiders also exit as a precursor to independent institutions being set up.

Thousands of students and teachers took to the streets of the capital on Tuesday, rejecting dialogue with interim president Abdelkader Bensalah.

Tahkout's business group owns one of Algeria's biggest automobile dealerships.

Among those accused alongside Tahkout are his son and two of his brothers, 38 civil servants and three employees of Tahkout's businesses, according to the prosecutor.

The 45 under investigation are being probed for money laundering, concealing the illicit transfer of goods obtained through corruption and squandering public money.

Among the remaining 11 persons of interest are a former prime minister, two former ministers and a current minister, the statement said, without giving names.

The positions occupied by the 11 at the time of the alleged events means they enjoy immunity, but their cases have been sent to the public prosecutor to decide on further action.

The justice ministry said on Monday that Algeria's upper house would vote on June 19 on whether to lift the parliamentary immunity of two Bouteflika-era ministers — Said Barkat and Djamel Ould Abbes.

Several prominent politicians and businessmen linked to Bouteflika have been detained or questioned in connection with corruption since the president was forced to step down after two decades in power.

Morocco adopts law confirming Berber as official language

By - Jun 11,2019 - Last updated at Jun 11,2019

RABAT — Moroccan lawmakers have unanimously approved a bill that confirms the Berber language's official status, eight years after it was preliminarily recognised in a new constitution.

The new law is designed to cement use of Berber — alongside Arabic — by government administration, local authorities, public services, schools and in cultural life.

Berber, or Amazigh, was initially recognised as an official langauge in 2011, after a decades-long battle by activists.

The kingdom has struggled to cement the language's status, despite it being the mother tongue of a large part of the population. 

The new law will "operationalise the official status of Amazigh... preserving the language and protecting cultural heritage", said Culture Minister Mohamed Laaraj after the vote, which took place late on Monday.

But a prominent Berber activist and intellectual said the law does not go far enough.

"It is not what most Amazigh were waiting for — this law remains vague, it does not say that Amazigh must be taught or used by the media,” Mohamed Assid told AFP.

"According to a 2004 census, 8 million people — a quarter of Morocco's population — speak one of the three Berber dialects every day.

One of the most notable consequences of giving the language official status has been the appearance of the Berbers' tifinagh alphabet on public buildings, alongside Arabic and French.

Since 2010, a state TV channel, Tamazight TV, has been promoting Amazigh culture. 

A few years ago, lawmakers caused a sensation by speaking Berber in parliament.

Moroccan administrators have sporadically refused to write Berber first names in civil registries.

The Amazigh flag — a red emblem set against thick yellow, blue and green horizontal stripes — has featured strongly in protests in Berber regions, including in the periodically restive northern Rif. 

When Iran was at the ‘edge of the abyss’

Demonstrations that took place 10 years ago initiated massive participation of youth

By - Jun 11,2019 - Last updated at Jun 11,2019

In this file photo taken on June 9, 2009, supporters of Iranian presidential candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi wave green flags — his campaign colour — as they attend a pro-reform rally at Haydarniya Stadium, in Tehran (AFP photo)

TEHRAN — A decade has passed since Iran held its most bitterly contested elections ever, the aftermath of which shook the Islamic republic to its core over allegations of mass electoral fraud.

Massive demonstrations and counter demonstrations by protesters and state supporters raged across major cities for 19 months, nowhere more so than in the capital Tehran, in what was later described by Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, as the "edge of the abyss".

As the world watched on in amazement, the so-called “Green Movement” that started out with "silent" demonstrations against ultra-conservative Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's reelection as president and demands for an independent recount evolved into running battles between protesters and security forces.

The advent of camera-equipped mobile phones and the spread of the Internet meant images of the protests fanned out quickly, causing the main focus of the demonstrations to switch from electoral fraud to repression.

The determination of the state to stamp out what it considered to be "sedition" at any cost, including mass trials and death sentences, gradually brought the movement to a standstill.

One of the reformists arrested in the first wave of the crackdown was journalist and activist Ahmad Zeidabadi.

"History will look back at the defeat of the ‘Green Movement’ as a bitter event that left its supporters extremely and deeply frustrated and disillusioned," said Zeidabadi, who was detained the day after the election.

Amir Mohebbian, a conservative politician and analyst, said the circumstances had changed in many ways since 2009 when "the state realised that the opposition and America" were behind the riots, and therefore used its "full powers to take control of the situation".

 

 ‘Where is my vote?’ 

 

The 2009 election campaign might well have been one of the most dynamic in the Islamic republic's history.

The one-on-one TV debates between candidates changed the mood of the campaign from festive to a bitter face-off, none more so than an explosive encounter between Ahmadinejad and his main challenger Mir Hossein Mousavi.

On Friday, June 12 when polling stations opened, the turnout — officially at 85 per cent — forced voting hours to be extended late into the night.

The first signs that something had gone awry came when Iranians realised the SMS messaging system had been disabled overnight.

Reformists soon claimed telephone lines to their vote tallying centres had been cut and many observers had not been allowed to enter polling stations.

Later on, some of Mousavi's main campaign centres in Tehran were closed by security forces.

Mousavi held an impromptu press conference late at night and claimed victory, warning that any reports to the contrary would be a sign of fraud.

The final official count showed Ahmadinejad had won with nearly 63 per cent of the vote, and within hours sporadic protests began in Tehran and soon spread to other major cities.

As the vote breakdown was published, reformists pointed to irregularities and claims of mass fraud gained traction.

Ahmadinejad's victory rally on June 14, in which he called protesters "dirt and rubbish", riled many voters.

When Mousavi and the other reformist candidate Mehdi Karroubi, who had officially gained 34 and 1 per cent respectively, called for a counter rally in Tehran on June 15 the response by supporters was beyond expectations.

There is no official figure as to how many took part in the demonstration on that Monday but reports from different political factions claimed more than 3 million marched in silence onto Azadi Square.

Holding banners asking "Where is my vote?" they waved green flags, Mousavi's official campaign colour.

 ‘Heartbreaking’ death 

 

Demonstrations continued throughout the week with reports of clashes between protesters and security forces.

The authorities demanded that candidates pursue complaints through the Guardian Council, tasked with supervising elections.

A recount of 10 per cent of ballot boxes was held, confirming Ahmadinejad's victory, but his challengers contested the council's neutrality and refused to accept its ruling.

On Saturday, June 20 another massive rally in central Tehran turned violent as protesters and security forces clashed.

Though local and foreign media were now banned from attending the rallies, many powerful pictures and videos emerged.

One depicted the shooting that day of Neda Agha Soltan, a student in her 20s, whose death was described as "heartbreaking" by then US president Barack Obama.

That Saturday's protests were among the bloodiest, only matched by the fierce clashes on December 27, 2009.

Though gradually declining in size and frequency, the protests went on until February 2011, the last time Mousavi and Karroubi called for demonstrations before authorities placed them under house arrest, where they now remain.

It was never known how many people lost their lives or were wounded during the protests. The state says dozens were killed, mostly by "seditionists".

For Ali Shakouri-Rad, one of the last active reformist politicians, Iranians have since moved on and have become "occupied with issues other than elections, such as the economy".

Politician and analyst Mohebbian said the people and the state had come to a compromise: the Islamic republic "would not constrain the social lives of people beyond some nominal actions" and in return the people would to a degree "support the state in the [present] circumstances".

For many international observers, though, it was the "summer of Tehran" that inspired the Arab Spring uprisings that began at its demise.

In Syria’s breadbasket, Kurds and regime battle for wheat

By - Jun 11,2019 - Last updated at Jun 11,2019

A photo taken on May 21 shows a farmer and his goats in a field in Syria's north-eastern region of Hasakeh (AFP photo)

AMUDA, Syria — Gazing over his wheat field in north-eastern Syria, farmer Adel Othman expects a bumper crop this year, but two rival authorities squabbling over his harvest have dashed his enthusiasm.

After successive droughts and eight years of civil war, both the local Kurdish authorities and the Damascus regime are desperate to buy up his region's produce to feed their people and maintain the peace.

In a country where millions depend on bread as a staple food to survive, both want the wheat grown in the country's north-eastern breadbasket region of Hasakeh.

Farmers in the Kurdish-held region like Othman have been caught up in the middle, with only two potential buyers, neither offering a satisfactory price.

Our "livelihood should not be transformed into a political bargaining chip", said the 55-year-old, his sky-blue shirt streaked in places with dry earth.

The regime is offering a better price, but the Kurds have said no wheat can leave the region under their control.

"We'll sell our crop to the highest bidder," Othman said in Kurdish by his field in the area of Amuda.

"In the end, a farmer needs to make a profit," he said, his short black hair slightly unruly above a thick moustache.

Farmers are especially eager to sell their crop to make up for poor harvests in previous years, but also to save them from fires — some claimed by Daesh — that have ravaged fields in the region.

 

 'Food crisis' 

 

Syria's Kurds have largely stayed out of the eight-year civil war, instead setting up their own institutions in areas under their control.

But they did lead the US-backed fight against Daesh in Syria, and are now hoping that will give them leverage in retaining a degree of autonomy in the northeast.

"The Kurds do not want to let wheat out because the production is barely enough to feed the local population," Syria expert Fabrice Balanche said.

"If the wheat went off to Damascus because of the higher price, it would cause a food crisis," he added.

According to the World Food Programme, 6.5 million people in Syria are "food insecure", or do not know where their next meal is coming from.

This year Syria is anticipating an ample crop yield after abundant rain, following a wheat harvest last year that was the worst since 1989.

The Syrian government is expecting 850,000 tonnes of wheat from Hasakeh.

The head of the Damascus government's agriculture office in Hasakeh, Amer Sello, told AFP he expected to snap up most of the province's harvest.

"Government cereal reception centres will see growers flock because of the attractive prices," he said.

The Kurds last month increased their buying price for a kilogramme of wheat from 150 to 160 Syrian pounds ($0.37), but that is still not enough to compete with the regime's offered 185.

The Kurdish grain authority chief, Salman Bardo, accused the regime of announcing its higher price "to sow discord between the people and the autonomous administration".

The Kurds would not permit the regime to ferry the cereal to other parts of Syria, he said.

"We will not allow it to leave north-east Syria," he added, without providing further details on how this would be achieved.

 

 ‘Wheat weapon’ 

 

After successive Russia-backed victories against rebels and terrorists since 2015, President Bashar Assad's regime today controls some 60 per cent of the country.

But Syrians in these areas are struggling to get by in an economy ravaged by war, as well as facing fuel shortages the regime blames on international sanctions.

"Assad needs access to cereal crops in northeast Syria to prevent a bread crisis in the areas of western Syria that he controls," Syria analyst Nicholas Heras said.

But in the almost 30 per cent of the country they control, the Kurds and their US ally also need to cling on to the wheat as a trump card in ongoing negotiations.

Damascus and the Kurds have started talks to discuss the future of the northeast, but so far without success.

At a national level, endless rounds of UN-brokered peace talks have also failed to end the war.

"Wheat is a weapon of great power in this next phase of the Syrian conflict," Heras said.

And the Kurds and their US ally "have a significant stockpile of this wheat weapon", Heras said.

Pages

Pages



Newsletter

Get top stories and blog posts emailed to you each day.

PDF