You are here

Will 2018 witness the end of Islamist militancy?

Dec 20,2017 - Last updated at Dec 20,2017

The year 2017 will be looked upon as setting a crucial milestone in the long and costly war against jihadists and in particular the self-proclaimed "caliphate" of Daesh. In the past few weeks there has been a number of celebratory events — all marking the defeat of this brutal cult. Iraqi Prime Minister Haidar Al-Abadi declared two weeks ago that Iraq had finally rid itself of the terrorist group, which at one point was close to taking over Baghdad. Likewise, the US administration also claimed that President Donald Trump had finally defeated "ISIS", the acronym used by Western media. And last week President Vladimir Putin announced, as he paid a surprises visit to a Russian base in northwest Syria, that he was ordering a troop withdrawal now that Russian forces had delivered a fatal blow to Daesh in that war-torn country.

But is it too early to sign the death certificate of one of the most enigmatic and radical takfiri groups in recent history? French President Emanuel Macron announced on Sunday that Daesh will be crushed in Syria by next February. Despite heavy losses in eastern Syria, where they were dislodged from key positions, remnants of the group are believed to have dispersed in the open desert of southern and eastern Syria. The same could be said about Iraq where experts believe fighters maybe regrouping in no-man's land, along the Syrian-Iraq borders, to wage an insurgency. Little is known about the fate of its top leaders including Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi.

But while the so-called "caliphate" no longer exists, the brand continues to linger. There are reports that hardline fighters fleeing Iraq and Syria maybe recuperating in Libya; a failing country with rival governments and many militias. Furthermore, Daesh remains active in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Somalia, Nigeria and northern Sinai. Even in Syria a small heavily armed faction, Jaish Khaled Ibn Al Walid, remains wedged in the Yarmouk River basin not far from Israeli and Jordanian borders.

In addition to all this you have Daesh sympathisers and sleeper cells in some European countries, where the threat of terrorist attacks remains a present danger. And while Daesh may have been defeated on the ground, it maintains its propaganda arm remains active online.

The military fight is only one component of the war on Islamist militancy. Even after more than four years since it emerged, little is known about the group's infrastructure and internal workings. To this date, Iraqis are searching for answers on how few militants were able to march into Iraq's second largest city of Mosul in 2014 and take control in a matter of hours. Moreover, there are plenty of unanswered questions regarding the fall of Raqqa in Syria and the role that foreign powers had played in enabling the rise of Daesh in such a short time.

But if 2017 is to become the year that witnessed the collapse of the group as a quasi-state with vast territorial control, 2018 should be the year that sees the beginning of the defeat of the dogma that continues to appeal to disenfranchised young men and women. This requires a major shift in strategy and approach. It also underlines the need to examine individual cases in order to pinpoint the common denominators that tie Al Shabaab in Somalia to Boko Haram in Nigeria and the group's proxy in Sinai to its affiliate in Afghanistan.

There are straightforward remedies, difficult as they may seem, that must be implemented to undercut the jihadists' access to fertile incubator environments. In Iraq and Syria that means an end to sectarian politics and the mustering of a political will to create a new society based on citizenship rights, democracy, civil institutions, separation of powers and an independent judiciary. In Europe it mandates a thorough look at the reasons why so many young second-generation Muslims feel marginalised and unable to integrate. Across the vast Muslim world it requires a dedicated and sustainable campaign to rid Islam of radical, antagonistic and isolationist dogma that allows the likes of Baghdadi to rally young and aggravated Muslim youth.

There is no doubt that the fight against self-proclaimed jihadists is not over year. There are genuine fears that a third wave of Islamist militancy may be in the works. A dangerous ingredient may have just been added by the irresponsible decision of President Trump to recognise Jerusalem as Israel's capital. The risk of turning the Arab-Israeli conflict into a religious war has never been greater. He may have handed religious extremists, on both sides of the divide, a lifeline. Al Qaeda and Daesh had rarely treated Palestine as a central cause, but that could be about to change as the issue of Islam's holy sites in Jerusalem continues to enrage Muslims all over as a result of the US move.

 

 

Osama Al Sharif is a journalist and political commentator based in Amman.

up
172 users have voted.

Comments

It is wrong to link militancy to a religion because Islam is a religion of non violence. acts of violence are committed by people and by any religion. I think that it is not helpful to continue to link acts of violence to muslims and their religion.

"A third wave of Islamic militancy is in the making"? Somehow, one suspects the very first and only wave is still moving on. It has not been defeated, but is spreading to Africa, S E Asia... Year 2018 is not going to witness end of jihadist movement, instead, things could get worse.

Add new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Newsletter

Get top stories and blog posts emailed to you each day.