You are here

It is not just a Muslim ban, it is much worse

Feb 06,2017 - Last updated at Feb 06,2017

With a stroke of the pen on a misdirected and, I believe, malicious executive order (EO), President Donald Trump unleashed a dynamic that will, I fear, have consequences as far reaching and damaging to my country and my community as the Bush administration’s wrong-headed responses to the September 11 terror attacks.

What the various provisions of the EO have done is to deepen Arab popular anger at the United States, provide Daesh with a public relations gift, fuel Islamophobic fear here at home, while, at the same time, exacerbating sectarian tensions within the Arab community.

Suspending and placing restrictions on immigration and refugees from seven mostly Arab and Muslim-majority countries will not make America safer.

The data is clear. Immigrants from the countries on the White House list have not posed a threat to the US.

Those who have been excluded are largely either students, family members visiting their kin or business people. 

And vulnerable refugees from these same countries who are now being denied admission are among the most rigorously vetted individuals coming to America — ensuring that they pose no danger to our country.

What the EO has, in fact, done is cancel the visas of between 60,000 to 100,000 individuals.

It also resulted in a nightmare situation for hundreds of innocent people caught on the cusp of the implementation of the order, who were detained at airports, interrogated for hours and, in some instances, sent back to their countries of origin.

This has produced deeply moving stories of separated families, broken promises, shattered dreams and personal hurt that have intensified anti-American sentiment across the Middle East.

After September 11, in stark contrast with the widely held view that “Arabs hated our values”, our polling made clear that Arabs respected our people, our culture, our products, our country’s openness and tolerance, and the promise of our democracy.

What they resented was our policy towards them.

As one respondent noted: “I love America. I just feel that America doesn’t love me.”

Despite our devastating war in Iraq, our anti-Palestinian bias and our other failed policies across the region, what continued to hold hope for Arabs was that someday America will be true to its stated values.

Trump’s EO and the anti-Muslim rhetoric that accompanied it have shattered that hope. Daesh must be pleased.

Administration protests that the EO is not “a Muslim ban” do not pass the smell test. 

Granted, the freeze only includes seven countries, but the rhetoric used to describe the intent of the order has been clearly inspired by the anti-Muslim animus of a White House populated by a group of individuals with a long record of Islamophobia.

The language they used to make the case for the order has been taken directly from the writings of well-known Islamophobes.

In any case, this is how Trump’s supporters have been encouraged to understand the EO’s intent.

Added to this are stories circulating that the list will soon be expanded to include many more Muslim-majority countries, among them: Lebanon, Egypt and Pakistan.

Making matters worse, the administration has coupled its freeze of the refugee programme with the caveat that, in the future, priority status will be given to “persecuted minorities” — by which it means Christians.

Trump justified this by arguing that during the Obama years, it was “very difficult for Christians” to get refugee status to come to America.

This is a patently false case that has been frequently made by far-right ideologues.

In reality, the numbers of Christian and Muslim refugees entering the US each year are roughly the same.

The percentage of Iraqis admitted under the refugee programme already includes a very large number of Iraqi Christians. 

And while the numbers of Syrian Christians admitted as refugees were, in fact, quite low, it can be shown that this is due to the fact that most Syrian Christians are not refugees. Many, however, have come to America, either seeking asylum or under other visa programmes.

Nevertheless, this administration’s stated preference for Christians has only served to reinforce the notion that the EO is anti-Muslim, exacerbating sectarian tensions within the Arab community.

Having worked for decades to overcome religious divides, Arab Americans have had to face multiple challenges to their unity.

Recent immigrants still bearing wounds from their countries of origin have been the most vulnerable.

In this context, an administration-led anti-Muslim bias has taken a toll.

Added to this, recent news articles quoting some immigrant Syrian Christians and some Arab American Republicans expressing support for Trump’s EO have been hurtful.

The fallout of this EO will continue to play out. The partisan and sectarian divide it has fostered, the extremism it has fuelled and the damage it has done to America’s image will be with us for a long time.

Far from making us safer, this administration is putting us at greater risk.

Daesh is, no doubt, an evil movement that must be defeated. But, in reality, this group has never posed an existential threat to our country.


It could never do as much damage to the very idea of America and to the values to which we aspire as the foolish and dangerous policies put forward by this administration.

126 users have voted.

Add new comment

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.


Get top stories and blog posts emailed to you each day.