You are here

UNRWA again in the Trump Cross hair

Aug 30,2018 - Last updated at Aug 30,2018

The United Nations Relief and Works Agency known by its acronym as UNRWA is again in the cross hairs of the Trump administration. Following its massive and unilateral cut in funding to UNRWA, the US administration is now over reaching by intervening in the mandate of the agency.

The UN General Assembly is the only party that has a right to intervene in the mandate of UNRWA, which was established by Resolution 302 (IV) of 8 December 1949 “to carry out direct relief and works programmes for Palestine refugees”. 

The agency began operations on 1 May 1950. In the absence of a solution to the Palestine refugee problem, the General Assembly has repeatedly renewed UNRWA’s mandate, most recently extending it until 30 June 2020.

The Trump team led by the president’s son in law Jared Kushner is working overtime to fulfil the right wing agenda of the state of Israel. A look at the biographies of the team working on the Middle East conflict one is bound to see that the entire team is totally in the Zionist camp. Between Jewish and Christian Zionists the team is not only carrying out the Israeli policy, but appears to be over reaching in its efforts to speedily obliterate the Palestinian national cause of which Jerusalem and the right of return are an integral part thereof.

The latest US over reach and interference in the mandate of UNRWA is focused on the attempts to dictate to the UN agency who qualifies as a refugee. The US wants to reduce the number of Palestinian refugees from 5 million to less than five hundred thousand. In the eyes of the Trump Zionist team only men and women who became refugees in 1948 qualify, but not their children or grandchildren.

On its official website UNRWA states that its services are available to all those living in its area of operations who meet this definition, who are registered with the agency. “The descendants of Palestine refugee males, including adopted children, are also eligible for registration.” When the agency began operations in 1950, it was responding to the needs of about 750,000 Palestine refugees. Today, some 5 million Palestine refugees are eligible for UNRWA services.

US attempts to unilaterally change the status of Palestinian refugees will do little to reduce the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, which is suffering in large part due to the Israel siege on the populated strip. Attempting to change the status of Palestinian refugees will do little to change the situation of 2 million registered refugees in Jordan, home to the largest group of refugees in countries neighbouring to Palestine.

The change in who is recognised as a Palestinian refugees will do little to change the Palestinian insistence on the right of return as enshrined in UN Resolution 194. While Palestinians have consistently stressed the need for Israel to recognise its historic and ethnical role in creating the Palestinian refugees crisis, there has been reports that Palestinian negotiators were willing to negotiate how this right is actually implemented. But accepting to negotiate, for example how many refugees will be allowed to return to Israel within a comprehensive agreement that includes an independent Palestinian state does not mean that a super power like the US can dictate beforehand who is and who is not a refugee, and whether the Palestinian refugees have or do not have the right to return.

If the US is genuinely interested in peace, a more productive move by Washington would be to initiate a process that will include revisiting the permanent status issues that were left unsolved by the Memorandum of Understanding (MoW) signed in the White House Lawn in 1993. The MoU which is also referred to as the Oslo Accords called for the resolution of borders, Jerusalem, settlements, refugees and security arrangements by 1999.  

Today nineteen years later, the United States a sponsor of those accords cannot simply ignore this agreement and the many UN resolutions and simply take sides and force down Palestinian throats the Israeli positions on issues of disagreement like Jerusalem and refugees.

up
25 users have voted.

Comments

MY QUESTION AGAIN IS WHO IS AND WHAT IS HOLDING THE UNITED NATIONS FROM DECLARING AND RECOGNIZING THE AN INDEPENDENT STATE OF PALESTINE?. THIS SHOULD BE WHAT HAPPENS IN THIS GENERAL ASSEMBLY. ALL THE EFFORTS TO
SETTLE THIS ISSUE FROM THE TOP TO BOTTOM HAS FAILED SO THIS IS THE TIME FOR ACTION AT THE UN AND IF NOT, THE
ARAB WORLD SHOULD CONSIDER WALKING OUT AND FORGET ALL ABOUT THE UNITED NON-NATION OF CHAOS.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

IN FACT I NEVER KNEW THAT THE UN RESOLUTION 302(IV) WAS PASSED ON THE 8TH OF DECEMBER 1949. CAN ANY ONE IN THIS WORLD IMAGINE HOW LONG THIS HAS BEEN AND STILL NO END IN SIGHT. HAD THIS BEEN IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY IN THE WORLD, THIS ISSUE OF REFUGEES IN PALESTINE WOULD HAVE ENDED SO THE QUESTION IS WHY IS THE PALESTINIANS THE OUTLIERS OF ANY UN RESOLUTION?. WHAT SHOULD HAPPEN IN THE UPCOMMING UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY IS THAT THE PALESTINIANS AND THEIR SUPPORTERS SHOULD AT THAT FORUM REQUEST THAT UN DECLARE AN OFFICIAL INDEPENDENT PALESTINIAN STATE AND REFUSE TO ACCEPT ANY MORE MICKY-MOUCE DEALS THAT CAN FIND THEIR WAYS TOWARDS INFINITY AND REMAIN ON THE FLOOR UNTIL THEIR DEMAND IS MET SO THAT WE CAN DO AWAY WITH LIVING LIKE NOMARDS AND DEPENDING ON HAND OUTS FOR SCHOOLS AND FOOD ON THE TABLE. THIS IS SHOCKING!!!!!

Add new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Newsletter

Get top stories and blog posts emailed to you each day.