You are here

‘Family honour’: Cassation Court reviews Jerash death sentence case

By Rana Husseini - Apr 15,2018 - Last updated at Apr 15,2018

AMMAN — The Court of Cassation has started reviewing a March death sentence issued by the Criminal Court against a 24-year-old man who murdered his niece on a university campus in the name of family honour in Jerash in April 2016.

The court declared the defendant, a Yarmouk University student, guilty of stabbing his niece at her campus on April 13 and handed him the death penalty.

Court documents said the victim’s father worked in the United Arab Emirates so the defendant “appointed himself as the monitor of his nieces’ behaviours, whereabouts and the kind of clothes they were wearing”.

Two days before the murder, the court documents maintained, the defendant suspected that the “victim was lying about her whereabouts and he did not believe her stories”.

“The defendant first decided to kill her at her house then changed his mind and decided to kill her at the university where they studied,” the court added.

On the day of the murder, the court stated, the defendant did not go to his classes and instead asked the victim to take him to her university because he wanted to meet a girl there.

“Once they entered the campus, the defendant walked with the victim for a while then drew a switchblade he was hiding and stabbed her repeatedly in the stomach,” the court added.

The victim was rushed to a nearby hospital in critical condition and died 14 hours later as a result of internal bleeding resulting from the stabs to her stomach, the court added.

The defendant, who was arrested at the scene, claimed in front of investigators that “he had dreams that the victim was engaged in immoral activities and that these dreams kept haunting him and that is why he killed her”, according to the 19-page verdict.

The defendant, who pleaded not guilty to the charges during his opening trial, also claimed that he “disapproved of the victim and her sisters’ choice of clothes and had criticised them,” the court maintained.

In its ruling, the tribunal said that the defendant does not benefit from a reduction in penalty since “not all of the relatives of the victim dropped charges against him”.

Assistant to the General Attorney and Criminal Court Prosecutor Jawaher Jbour had asked the court to inflict the maximum punishment against the defendant, saying “there is no justification to what the defendant did and he has no right to control the live of his niece in terms of what she wore, how she behaved and to end her life”.

The tribunal comprised judges Mohammad Baloush, Omar Kloub and Tareq Shakhanbeh.

up
21 users have voted.

Comments

HERE WE GO AGAIN ABOUT THE FACTS THAT GOVERNS THE WOMEN IN THE ARAB WORLD. YES, ALL DEATH SENTENSES SHOULD BE SUBJECT TO AUTOMATIC APEALS BUT THIS ONE DOES NOT NEED TO BE HEARD OR REVIEWED. HOWEVER, I AM AGAINST DEATH AS A FORM OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT NO MATTER THE CRIME BUT THOSE WHO ARE KILLING WOMEN IN THE NAME OF ANY FORM OF RELIGION SHOULD BE JAILED FOR LIFE WITH HARD LABOR, ALLOWED ONLY TWO LOAFS OF BREAD A DAY. MAKE HIM STAND EVERY MORNING WITH ARMED GUARDS AND FORCE HIM TO BOW FOR ALL THE WOMEN AT THAT UNIVERSITY EVERY MORNING. JUST LIKE IN US WHERE MY REPUBICAN FRIENDS ARGUE THAT GUNS TO KILL BUT PEOPLE KILL, I HAVE ALWAYS MAINTAIND THAT ISLAM IS ONE OF THE WORLDS MAIN RELIGION AND MUST ALWAYS BE RESPECTED BECAUSE IT IS ONLY PEOPLE LIKE THIS CRIMINAL THAT GIVES MUSLIMS THE BAD NAME JUST LIKE SOME EVANGELICAL HYPOCHRISTIANS GIVES THE CHRISTIANS VERY BAD RAPS. MARTIN LUTHER KING SAID THAT WE SHOULD JUDGE BY THE CONTENT OF CHARCTERS AND COLOR SO WE IN THE WEST SHOULD STOP LINKING ANY CRIMINAL TO RELIGIOUS SECT.

Add new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 9 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Opinion

Newsletter

Get top stories and blog posts emailed to you each day.