You are here

Laziness and lack of sleep can shorten your life, especially when combined

By Los Angeles Times (TNS) - Dec 12,2015 - Last updated at Dec 12,2015

Photo courtesy of clipartpanda.com

You already know that smoking is bad for you and that drinking too much alcohol may shorten your life. Now a new study says that spending too much time in a chair and depriving yourself of necessary sleep should join a short list of behaviours known to increase your risk of premature death.

Sedentary time and lack of sleep were damaging in their own right, but when combined with more traditional risk factors, they had a multiplier effect that made an early death far more likely.

The findings, published in the journal PLOS Medicine, make clear that “some risk behaviours tend to cluster, particularly in certain patterns, and that the joint risk could be much higher than the sum of the individual risks,” the study authors wrote.

For instance, smoking was the most dangerous single risk factor among the six studied — the small number of people for whom smoking was their only vice were 90 per cent more likely to die during the course of the study than were people with practiced clean living across the board. People who reported high alcohol consumption — more than 14 alcoholic drinks per week — as their sole risk factor did not seem to be putting their lives in danger. But for those who combined heavy drinking with smoking, the risk of premature death was nearly tripled. And when lack of sleep was added to the mix, the odds of an early death were nearly five times greater — even though lack of sleep by itself had only a slight effect on mortality.

These numbers are based on the lives, and sometimes deaths, of 231,048 Australians from Sydney and rest of the state of New South Wales. They enrolled in the 45 and Up Study between 2006 and 2009, answering questions about their smoking history, eating and drinking habits, exercise routines, sedentary time and sleep duration. The study volunteers were tracked until the middle of 2014; during that time, 15,635 died.

When they joined the study, 7.2 per cent of the participants were smokers, 19.1 per cent were heavy drinkers, 17.2 per cent had a poor diet, 22.9 per cent got too little exercise, 25 per cent spent more than 7 hours sitting each day and 23.1 per cent got either too little or too much sleep. Nearly one-third (31.2 per cent) of the volunteers did not engage in any of these risk factors and 36.7 reported only one. However, 21.4 per cent of them admitted to two of these bad habits, 8.1 per cent admitted to three, 2.1 per cent reported four, 0.4 per cent had five and 0.04 per cent engaged in all six.

Except for heavy drinking, each of the six behaviours was associated with at least a slight increased risk of death during the study period, the researchers found. Smoking was the most dangerous, followed by lack of exercise.

After accounting for factors such as age, gender, education and other demographic factors, the researchers saw a clear pattern: The more deviations a person had from a clean lifestyle, the greater his or her risk of premature death. Compared to people with no risk factors, those with just one were 27 per cent more likely to die during the course of the study, and those with two had a 73 per cent increased risk of death. At the other end of the spectrum, people with five risk factors were 4.61 times more likely to die, and those with all six were 5.38 times more likely.

Some combinations were more deadly than others, the researchers found. Those who blended insufficient exercise with prolonged sitting were 2.42 times more likely to die during the study, and those who were also guilty of sleeping for too many hours were 4.23 times more likely die by the time the study ended.

 “These findings suggest there is a ‘synergistic effect’ among risk factors,” the study authors wrote.

The authors acknowledged that it was up to each volunteer to report on their smoking, sitting, sleeping and other behaviours, and some of them might have shaded the truth to impress the researchers. If so, the study results probably underestimate the true effects of the risk factors, they wrote.

 

The authors added that their results would be more meaningful if they tracked people’s risks behaviours over time, and if they could link those behaviours to heart disease or other specific causes of death. That information was not available when the analysis was done, they wrote.

up
555 users have voted.

Add new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 15 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.



Opinion

Editorial

Tuesday 23 July 2019

Newsletter

Get top stories and blog posts emailed to you each day.