You are here

Features

Features section

Dealing with the faceless virtual world

By - Oct 03,2019 - Last updated at Oct 03,2019

Storing your files in the cloud, working with the Internet and using online services and applications is great. That is when it works well. When it does not, then the experience can prove to be a painful one. When this happens and you try to contact “someone” to solve the problem, you often find yourself having to deal with a faceless party. Nothing can be more frustrating, more harrowing.

Although we all have gotten more or less accustomed to using virtual services, from the soft and warm comfort of our laptop computer, tablet or smartphone, we still feel the visceral need to talk to a very real human being to solve our problems. Seeing the people supposed to help you, or at least being able to speak to them, if only over the phone, still makes a big difference. In ideal cases a video call would take place. We may have entered the age of robotics, but we are not yet 100 per cent robots yet.

There are various degrees of severity to the situation. If the Internet-based service you have an issue with has a local branch you can pay a visit to, in your own town, going there in person to talk to the customer support people would probably help — assuming that they have been well trained, are willing to help, and are up to the job! This is the case for all of us here in Amman, who deal with Orange, Zain, local banks, the tax department, Social Security, utility companies and various administrations.

But how would you do it when your service provider in the cloud is in another country and, what’s more, is a giant organisation that does not necessarily have the time to speak to you? From Amazon, to Netflix, Spotify, Uber, Careem, GoDaddy, BeIn Sport, Dropbox, Hostgator, TeamViewer, Google (for Gmail and online applications), Apple and Microsoft, to name a few of the main really big ones, we all have something to do with them at some point.

How personalised, how efficient, how friendly their customer support is varies greatly from one of these big companies to another.

However big it is, I found talking to Amazon to be fast, easy and convenient. They do try to provide you with an answer to your question through the usual FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) and text-based knowledge base, but when none of these works, you can still make a good old fashioned phone call to Amazon, speak to a human being, and yes, they will answer and solve your problem.

On the other hand service at Spotify (music streaming) is harder to get. However, they do have this online text chat, which is somewhere in between a cold, entirely robotic gateway, and a warm, personalised help channel. I used it a couple of times already and I must admit I got the answers that I needed rather quickly. Given the conversational style used in the communication, I had hard time telling whether the party chatting with me was a real person or a software application. Nevertheless, and putting feelings aside, it worked!

Among those who play the really hard to get I found Uber and Dropbox, with a significant difference between these two. The Uber mobile application used to call a driver has been lately working in a jerky manner. This is confirmed by a good number of users in Amman, even by some of the drivers themselves, and over a period extending to several weeks. Yet, there was no way to speak to someone there to report and to discuss the issue.

Dropbox cloud storage service is another story. Although speaking to them is virtually impossible, one has to acknowledge that their system is practically flawless and you almost never need to contact them and ask for help. Why then should anyone complain?

The user expects online services either to be near-perfect or to provide a “reasonably human” communication channel to contact them in case of problems. That is until we all become robots.

Hillary Clinton says ‘gutsiest’ personal thing she ever did was stay in her marriage

By - Oct 02,2019 - Last updated at Oct 02,2019

Former president Bill Clinton kisses his wife former secretary of state and presidential candidate Hillary Clinton at a Clinton Global Initiative function (Photo courtesy of freebeacon.com)

By Savannah Behrmann 

WASHINGTON — Former secretary of state and presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said on Tuesday that the “gutsiest” personal thing she’s ever done was “stay in my marriage”.

The frank comments from Clinton came as she and her daughter, Chelsea, appeared on ABC’s “Good Morning America” to promote their new book, “The Book of Gutsy Women”.

At the end of the joint interview, host Amy Robach asked Clinton “what’s the gutsiest thing you’ve ever done?”

“Ah, boy, I think the gutsiest thing I’ve ever done — well, personally, make the decision to stay in my marriage,” Clinton answered. “Publicly, politically, run for president. And keep going. Just get up every day and keep going.”

The former First Lady, who was the 2016 Democratic presidential nominee, has been married to former President Bill Clinton for more than 40 years.

While Bill Clinton was president, he engaged in a sexual relationship with White House intern Monica Lewinsky and was eventually impeached for perjury and obstruction of justice in the wake of the extramarital affair. However, the Senate acquitted him of both charges and Clinton went on to serve the remainder of his second term in office.

Chelsea Clinton, when asked the same question after her mother, said she was “overwhelmed by my mother’s answer that I’m a bit out of words”.

Clinton also told ABC that she had not been questioned in relation to recent reports that the Trump administration is investigating the e-mail records of dozens of current and former State Department officials who sent e-mails to her private e-mail address.

“I think it’s an unfortunate diversion,” Clinton said. “You go and you talk to people who’ve been experienced diplomats for many years, and then you retroactively classify what they said 10 years ago? I think it’s really a shame that they’re doing that, and hopefully people will not be distracted.”

On Tuesday, Clinton also sarcastically responded to Rudy Guiliani, President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer, who invoked the Clinton Foundation while defending his involvement in the Ukraine controversy that has led to an impeachment inquiry into Trump.

“WP [Washington Post], NBC, and CNN are going after me because I’m the messenger, and covering up the message, Dem corruption,” Giuliani Tweeted. “Meanwhile, they have, yet, to ask Biden difficult questions because he is protected and immune like the Clintons and crooked Clinton Foundation!”

Clinton quote-Tweeted his statement and quipped, “Yes, I am famously under-scrutinised.”

Ocean plastic waste probably comes from merchant ships

By - Oct 01,2019 - Last updated at Oct 01,2019

Photo courtesy of freepik.com

WASHINGTON — Most of the plastic bottles washing up on the rocky shores of Inaccessible Island, aptly named for its sheer cliffs rising from the middle of the South Atlantic, probably come from Chinese merchant ships, a study published on Monday said. 

The study offers fresh evidence that the vast garbage patches floating in the middle of oceans, which have sparked much consumer hand-wringing in recent years, are less the product of people dumping single-use plastics in waterways or on land, than they are the result of merchant marine vessels tossing their waste overboard by the ton. 

The authors of the study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, or PNAS, collected thousands of pieces of waste during visits to the tiny island in 1984, 2009 and again in 2018. 

The island is located roughly midway between Argentina and South Africa in the South Atlantic gyre, a vast whirlpool of currents that has created what has come to be known as an oceanic garbage patch.

While initial inspections of the trash washing up on the island showed labels indicating it had come from South America, some 3,000 kilometres to the west, by 2018 three-quarters of the garbage appeared to originate from Asia, mostly China.

Many of the plastic bottles had been crushed with their tops screwed on tight, as is customary on board ships to save space, said report author Peter Ryan, director of the FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology at the University of Cape Town in South Africa.

Around 90 per cent of the bottles found had been produced in the previous two years, ruling out the possibility that they had been carried by ocean currents over the vast distance from Asia, which would normally take three to five years.

Since the number of Asian fishing vessels has remained stable since the 1990s, while the number of Asian — and in particular, Chinese — cargo vessels has vastly increased in the Atlantic, the researchers concluded that the bottles must come from merchant vessels, which toss them overboard rather than dumping them as trash at ports.

“It’s inescapable that it’s from ships, and it’s not coming from land,” Ryan told AFP. 

“A certain sector of the merchant fleet seems to be doing that, and it seems to be largely an Asian one,” he said. 

 

Fishing nets

 

There are two distinct types of marine pollution.

On the one hand, there are the beaches around urban centres: the plastics that are found there come from coastal areas, and include bottles, bags and packaging. But these things sink easily and are less likely to be carried far by currents. 

Farther out in the oceans, the garbage patches contain fragments of objects of unclear origin, as well as items used by cargo ships and fishing fleets: not just the bottles emptied by the ships’ crews, but also nets, ropes, buoys, crates, barrels and floats.

“It’s an underappreciated cause of pollution,” said Ryan.

Half of the great Pacific garbage patch is made up of fishing nets, by weight, according to a report published last year in Scientific Reports.

Oceanographer Laurent Lebreton, one of the authors of the latter report, said that the oft-quoted figure of 80 per cent of plastic pollution coming from the land does not apply to the high seas. 

He recalled having found huge clusters of nets created by fishing vessels in the North Pacific, known as “fish aggregating devices” to attract fish.

“Often they don’t retrieve them and they are lost. We have found several tonnes of them,” said Lebreton, of the organisation The Ocean Cleanup.

“Everyone talks about saving the oceans by stopping using plastic bags, straws and single use packaging. That’s important, but when we head out on the ocean, that’s not necessarily what we find,” he told AFP.

‘Abominable’ has biggest original animation opening of the year

By - Oct 01,2019 - Last updated at Oct 01,2019

Scene from movie ‘Abominable’ (Photo courtesy of imdb.com)

By Sonaiya Kelley

LOS ANGELES — Universal’s “Abominable” opened in first place with $20.9 million, just a hair above analyst projections of $17 million to $20 million, according to estimates from measurement firm Comscore.

Internationally the film added $8.8 million across 30 territories for a global cumulative of $30.5 million.

A co-production between DreamWorks Animation and China’s Pearl Studios, the film posted the biggest opening for an original animated film this year and is just the third original film to open in first place at the domestic box office behind the studio’s earlier hits “Us” and “Good Boys”.

The $75 million film, about a young girl on a journey with a yeti, was well-received with an A CinemaScore and an 80 per cent “fresh” rating on review aggregation site Rotten Tomatoes.

In second place, Focus Features’ “Downton Abbey”, now in its second weekend, added $14.5 million (a 53 per cent drop) for a cumulative $58.5 million. Internationally, it earned $10 million for a global cumulative of $107.1 million.

At No. 3, STX Entertainment’s “Hustlers” added $11.5 million in its third weekend (a 32 per cent drop) for a cumulative $80.6 million. The film currently stands at $95.4 million globally.

In fourth place, Warner Bros.’ “It Chapter Two” added $10.4 million in its fourth weekend for a cumulative $194 million. It now stands at $417.4 million in global receipts.

Rounding out the top five, Fox’s “Ad Astra” added $10.1 million in its second weekend (a 47 per cent drop) for a cumulative $35.5 million. Globally, it stands at $89 million.

At No. 6, Lionsgate’s “Rambo: Last Blood” added $8.6 million in its second weekend (a 55 per cent drop) for a cumulative $33.1 million.

In seventh place, Roadside Attractions’ “Judy” opened with $3.1 million across 461 locations, a per-screen average of $6,705.

The film will be one to watch during awards season with early Oscar buzz surrounding Renee Zellweger’s performance as Judy Garland near the end of her life. It earned an 83 per cent “fresh” rating on Rotten Tomatoes.

At No. 8, Universal’s “Good Boys” added $2 million in its seventh weekend for a cumulative $80.4 million.

In ninth place, Disney’s “The Lion King” added $1.6 million in its 11th weekend for a cumulative $540 million.

Rounding out the top 10, Lionsgate’s “Angel Has Fallen” added $1.5 million in its sixth weekend for a cumulative $67.2 million.

In limited release, Roadside Attractions’ “The Peanut Butter Falcon” added $908,270 across 935 locations in its eighth weekend, bringing the film to a cumulative $18.1 million and making it the No. 1 indie platform release of 2019.

Well Go USA’s “First Love”, directed by Takashi Miike, led the week in per screen average with $12,075, earning $24,150 in two locations.

The animated film “Promare”, in its second weekend from GKids, added $113,455 in 31 locations to total $1.1 million domestically, including $775,000 from Fathom Events screenings.

Sony Pictures Classics’ “Where’s My Roy Cohn?” expanded into eight locations (up from four), adding $60,089 in its second weekend for a per-screen average of $5,007 and a cumulative $120,813.

This week, Warner Bros. opens the controversial “Joker” movie. In limited release, Fox Searchlight reveals the drama “Lucy in the Sky”.

How to address your roommate’s annoying habits without making things awkward

By - Sep 30,2019 - Last updated at Sep 30,2019

Photo courtesy of wisebread.com

By Rasha Ali

Roommates suck. Sorry not sorry.

There’s nothing more irritating than coming home after a long day to find an extra body in your dorm or apartment, breathing your air and taking up physical space. Aside from just existing, your roommate probably has a habit (or 15) that you’re not particularly fond of. We’re talking leaving dishes in the sink, playing music too loudly and eating your food.

Learning to live with someone — and how to deal with the habits they bring with them — can be emotionally, physically and spiritually challenging, says Dr Angela Corbo, chair of Widener University’s Communications Studies department.

Sure, living with someone is an experience, a right of passage, even. And who knows, you might end up liking your roomie enough to have a lifelong friendship, but that doesn’t mean you have to quietly suffer through their bad behaviour.

Here are some tips on how to deal with your roommate’s annoying habits without making things awkward at home.

 

Assess the situation

 

Is it really that serious? If you’re living in close quarters with someone, he or she is bound to get on your nerves at some point. So first figure out how important this point of contention between you and your roomie is.

“There are certainly plenty of big issues, especially those that impact your safety or sanity or ability to get a good night’s sleep, but many fall into the category of preferences or simply being different,” says Chris Grace, professor of psychology and director of Biola University’s Centre for Marriage and Relationships.

Corbo adds you should ask yourself a few questions before engaging in a conversation to discern if your problem is based on preference or necessity. For example “if a roommate neglects to make the bed in the morning, for example, ask yourself if that is something that will prevent you from having a productive day?”

 

Communicate effectively

 

Communication doesn’t just mean saying words to your roommate and hoping they start cleaning up after themselves. There’s communicating and then there’s effectively communicating — you want to do the latter.

Before choosing to confront your roommate, Grace says to take a minute and avoid speaking too quickly or too harshly. He suggests taking time to consider your roommate’s point of view and acknowledge their perspective as valid, which doesn’t have to be labelled as better or worse than yours, it’s just a differing perspective.

Corbo adds communication requires confidence and sensitivity. It’s important not to come off aggressively.

“It is one thing to say, ‘It is important to me to have the bed made each day because I feel like it signals the beginning of a new day,’ rather than, ‘I don’t know why you are so lazy and can’t pull up the comforter and blankets when you wake up.’”

She adds that addressing conflict can be uncomfortable and you may stumble in doing so. That’s OK.

 

It is not awkward

 

Confrontation may appear to be awkward because people often view confrontation as a negative thing, but it doesn’t have to be that way says Grace.

She notes something psychologists call the “liking gap”, which she says people think that other people like them less after a conversation.

“This can lead people to feel awkward or disliked, when in reality almost everyone underestimates how much the other person actually likes them,” Grace says. “Thus, more than we realise, our roommates probably like us more than we know, even when we have the inevitable, difficult conversation about differences.”

You also may need alone time to recover from a disagreement if it didn’t go as smoothly as planned.

“Learning to feel comfortable with a friend or roommate after a conflict requires maturity, humility and humour,” says Corbo. “Alone time may be necessary to recalibrate after a conflict but don’t avoid your roommate for too long. This extends the period of awkwardness and that can make the problem worse.”

Nissan Patrol V8 Platinum: Big beast of the Middle East

By - Sep 30,2019 - Last updated at Sep 30,2019

Photo courtesy of Nissan

Developed primarily for its biggest market, the latest iteration of Nissan’s behemoth Patrol SUV launched globally in Abu Dhabi last week. Building on a tried and tested recipe, the latest Patrol is as abundant in size, space, ability, equipment and output as its predecessor, and is sure to retain its segment leading position as a big family daily driver in the GCC. 

Less common, but still a regular sight in Jordan, the latest Patrol remains a reliable and more attainable alternative to other big luxury SUVs. 

Descended from a long line of tough utilitarian off-roaders that grew in size and comfort since 1951, the latest Patrol is the most refined, road-friendly and advanced yet. But with body-on-frame construction and extensive off-road hardware, it is just as happy on the school run as it is through the rugged outdoors. Luxurious but not too “precious”, exotic or delicate for actual off-road adventuring, the Patrol comes with escalating levels of luxury specifications, V6 or V8 engine options, and two new bumpers options for urban or off-road driving.

 

Edgy evolution

 

Dwarfing many SUVs, the hulking Patrol’s latest iteration is heavily redesigned — front and rear — despite a near identical silhouette and side views. Adopting a sharper and more upright fascia with a bigger and lower interpretation of Nissan’s V-motion grille, it also features deeper side intakes, more prominent lower lip and slim C-shaped LED lights that interlock with a sharply edged fascia frame. At the rear it gains more mature and stylish lights, and a full length chrome strip to emphasise its width and hunkered down stance.

Unchanged underneath its substantial bonnet, the range-topping Patrol’s naturally-aspirated direct injection 5.6-litre V8 engine drives all four wheels with default but variable rear-bias. 

Developing a mighty 400HP at 5800rpm and 413lb/ft torque at 4000rpm (gross), delivery is prodigiously progressive, with distantly subdued bellows and burbles. It nevertheless produces generous low-end and mid-range torque to hustle the Patrol’s 2.8-tonne mass at a lively pace, including an estimated 6.5-second 0-100km/h time. 

Providing good throttle control, the Patrol’s 7-speed automatic gearbox can meanwhile be operated in manual mode through the gear lever.

 

Reassuring ride

 

Riding on sophisticated double wishbone suspension with hydraulic dampers to curb squat and dive and provide level body control and supple ride comfort, the Patrol is in its element on highway. 

Developed with GCC roads and fast wide-angle curves in mind, it felt settled, comfortable and reassuring on 160km/h Abu Dhabi stretches. Not the most nimble through tightly winding hillclimbs, the Patrol is, however, more easily hustled through narrower, more flowing roads, where shifting weight out and rearwards tightens cornering lines and negates a slight instinct for understeer.

Refined and quiet inside, and buttoned down over bumps, the Patrol smoothly irons out road imperfections, despite low profile 275/60R20 tyres. 

Manoeuvrable and easy driving in town for its size due to a relatively big glasshouse, reversing camera, parking sensors and big door mirrors, it also benefits from light steering, which seems might have gained slight heft and nuance over its predecessor. Its steering nevertheless develops more road feel when loaded up through hard driven corners, while brakes proved reassuringly fade resistant on descent from Jebel Hafeet. 

 

Rugged yet refined

 

Driving through sandy flat desert routes with ease in default driving mode, the Patrol’s Terrain Mode driving selector can optimise various parameters for different conditions. Also fitted with electronic hill descent control, the Patrol’s extensive suite of off-road hardware more importantly includes low ratio four-wheel-drive for steep crawling speeds, locking rear differential for very low traction conditions, generous 275mm ground clearance and 28 degree approach and 26.3 degree departure angles. Approach angle improves to 34 degree when fitted with optional off-road bumper, while entry-level 18-inch alloy wheels are also available.

Handsome and abundantly spacious for passengers and cargo, the 8-seat Patrol features numerous improvements inside. Making extensive use of soft textures, quality materials and sturdy build quality, the new Patrol also introduces classy new diamond quilted GT-R Tan leather upholstery — inspired by its supercar stablemate — and improved side seat bolstering, enhanced ventilation and a much improved dual stacked screen infotainment system. Generously equipped with convenience, safety and driver assistance systems, the new Patrol also now features pedestrian detection capability to its Intelligent Emergency Braking and collision prevention system.

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

 

Engine: 5.6-litre, in-line V8-cylinders 

Bore x stroke (mm): 98 x 92mm

Valve-train: 32-valve, variable valve timing, DOHC, direct injection

Gearbox: 7-speed automatic, four-wheel-drive

Drive-train: Locking rear differential and 2.7:1 low gear transfer case

Power, HP (kW): 400 (294) @ 5,800rpm*

Torque, lb/ft (Nm): 413 (560) @ 4,000rpm*

0-97km/h: 6.5-seconds (est.)

0-160km/h: 17.8-seconds (est.)

Fuel consumption, city/highway: 16.8-/11.76-litres/100km (est.)

Fuel capacity: 140-litres

Height: 1,955mm (with roof rails)

Width: 1,995mm

Length: 5,315mm (with towing hook)

Wheelbase: 3,075mm

Minimum Ground clearance: 275mm

Approach/departure angles: 28 degree/26.3 degree

Kerb weight: 2716-2845kg

Gross vehicle weight: 3,500kg

Towing capacity: 2,000kg

Seating capacity: 8

Headroom, F/M/R: 1,037/1,015/924mm

Legroom, F/M/R: 1,065/989/721mm

Shoulder room, F/M/R: 1,620/1,612/1,537mm

Hip room, F/M/R: 1,503/1,483/1,240mm

Steering: speed-sensitive power assisted rack and pinion

Turning radius: 12.1-metres

Suspension: Independent, double wishbone with active hydraulic damping 

Brakes, F/R: Ventilated discs, 4-/1-piston callipers

Tyres: 275/60R20

*Gross power and torque

Intrusive, unwanted thoughts

By , - Sep 29,2019 - Last updated at Sep 29,2019

Photo courtesy of Family Flavours magazine

By Haneen Mas’oud

Clinical Psychologist

 

Do you find yourself constantly going back to check if you locked your front door or the car? People with obsessive thoughts and compulsive behaviours that interfere with daily life have Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD). 

 

What is OCD?

 

OCD is an anxiety disorder in which people have recurring, unwanted thoughts, ideas, or sensations (obsessions) that make them feel driven to do something repetitively (compulsions), which interfere with a person’s daily activities and social interactions, according to the American Psychiatric Association. These obsessions and compulsions can be time consuming and very exhausting to the person experiencing them. Rituals like checking, washing and cleaning are most common types of OCD, and are done to relieve the anxiety resulted by the obsessive thoughts.

 

Causes of OCD

 

Causes of OCD have not been identified but genetics and having a predisposition to develop OCD symptoms may be a factor along with environmental factors, such as childhood abuse, neglect, psychological and physical trauma, big life events like marriage, divorce and moving out.

 

Basic types of OCD

 

OCD patients may experience more than one type of OCD:

 

• Checkers: Those who feel compelled to repeatedly check objects; doors, locks, ovens and other appliances at home, or even checking in on their loved ones

• Washers and cleaners: Obsessions about contamination by germs, dirt and viruses 

• Orders and repeaters: Those who keep repeating particular actions or thoughts like prayers or arranging items in a specific perfect way

• Pure obsessionals: Some people experience sexual or aggressive obsessions that involve causing harm to others. They are mortified by such thoughts and, as a result, work very hard to suppress or push them away

• Hoarders: Those who collect unimportant items and face difficulties throwing them away, developing a strong attachment to these items while having the fear of needing them if thrown away

• People with scrupulosity: Those who have religious or ethical obsessions, being preoccupied with doing the right thing

 

Treatment options for OCD

 

The most effective treatment is Exposure and Response Prevention, a cognitive behavioural therapy that focuses on cognition and behaviour:

• The cognitive part is mainly focused on the faulty beliefs (the obsessions) the individual is experiencing

• The behaviour part includes exposing the individual to experience anxiety, provoking situations in a gradual process under the supervision of a psychologist

Medication can be prescribed to OCD patients to reduce the stress resulted by obsessions. However, a combination of both medication and cognitive behavioural therapy can be very helpful in breaking free from OCD symptoms.

Don’t hesitate to seek professional help if you have obsessions or compulsions that affect your daily life. Seeking professional help and enlisting the support of loved ones is very important to getting better.

 

Reprinted with permission from Family Flavours magazine

A frightening loss of habitat

By - Sep 29,2019 - Last updated at Sep 29,2019

Companions in Conflict: Animals in Occupied Palestine

Penny Johnson

Brooklyn-London: Melville House, 2019

Pp. 238

 

“Companions in Conflict” approaches Palestine from a totally new angle: animal welfare and its relationship to human welfare. The author, Penny Johnson, is a veteran activist for justice for the Palestinians. She has lived in Ramallah since the early 1980s, working as a human rights advocate, researcher and founding member of the Institute of Women’s Studies at Birzeit University, and writer/editor of numerous publications on Palestine.

In the introduction, she names “two particular measures… that led me to think about the lives of animals other than humans in this fragile land: times of walking and times of war”. (p. x)

With an expansive empathy for both human and animal suffering and dilemmas, a commitment to truth, and elegant prose, Johnson conveys her careful observations and research into Palestine’s fauna. 

Johnson has walked the land in many parts of Palestine, particularly the West Bank, and spoken with Palestinian farmers, bedouin and environmentalists. Her most frequent companion on these forays was her husband, Raja Shehadeh, the well-known Palestinian human rights lawyer, who has also written about walking in books such as “Palestine Walks” and “A Rift in Time”. 

Starting with the camel, the book devotes chapters to domesticated animals such as goats, sheep, donkeys and cows, considered useful by humans. Also explored is the status of wild animals from the beautiful gazelle and ibex, to others which are feared or considered threats, like hyenas, wild boars, wolves and jackals. For each species, Johnson traces its history in Palestine, as well as attitudes, fables and literature attached to it, often spiced with absurd or amusing anecdotes. 

There is the camel arrested by Israeli police in Jerusalem for not having a permit, and Beit Sahur’s dairy cows being declared dangerous to the state of Israel by the military governor, both clear parallels to human experience under the occupation. Then, there is Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu bragging that “a Jewish cow… a computerised cow” produces more milk than any other cow, in an odd confusion of terms. (p. 122)

It soon becomes clear that Johnson is not more concerned about animals than people. To her, it is not a zero-sum game but a question of interdependence: “I am all too aware of what we humans, Palestinians and those of us who live in Palestine, have in common with other mammals: a disturbing, even frightening loss of habitat. I explore how the lives of animals help us understand what is happening to all of us...”
(pp. xii-xiii) 

Just as Israeli land confiscation and settlements deprive Palestinians of their homes and livelihood, the patterns of animal life are disrupted. In addition to climate change, drought and rapid urbanisation that are affecting much of the world, it is the occupation’s land-and-water-grabbing measures that are most often found to be the reason for the diminishing number of animals, whether wild or domesticated. Israel’s electronic fence along Gaza deters animal as well as human circulation, and blocks access to water sources, as does the Wall itself. One species reported to be on the rise is the wild boar, which B’tselem attributes to “raw sewage runoff from the massive settlement complex of Ariel polluting water sources near Salfit and killing other wildlife while drawing wild pigs to its delicious detritus”. (p. 136) 

There are many other violations. Obviously, when curfews or military attacks threaten human lives and food supplies, the same applies to animals. Johnson also points out harmful Palestinian practices, such as unregulated hunting. Crucially, she shows how the occupation’s unhuman treatment of humans makes it difficult for Palestinian animal welfare advocates to plead their case. Here irony abounds: “It is no wonder that many Palestinians, even those concerned with the environment and animal welfare, are cynical about Israeli environmentalists advocating passage for animals, but not people, through the Separation Wall.” (p. 43) 

Another example came in 1916, when an international animal welfare organisation rescued a Bengal tiger named Laziz from “the worst zoo in the world” in Khan Younis, at a time when, as now, neither people nor products could easily get out of Gaza even for much needed medical treatment. “Gazans have a right to wonder [and, as is their wont, to joke] why Laziz’s life is valued over theirs.” (p. 199)

Johnson’s wholistic outlook on how humans could potentially interact with, benefit from and enjoy nature, including animals, courses throughout “Companions in Conflict”. She tells a story that has not been told before and which needs to be told, and which is especially timely as environmental issues gain more and more international urgency. Her tone is one of genuine inquiry. She has no ax to grind except for concern about the future of Palestine, its people and its nature, which she sees as interlinked. Though she is never polemical, the facts she presents reconfigure a discussion that Israel has tried to monopolise by presenting its policies as environment-friendly, when in fact its anti-Palestinian policies have wreaked havoc on the land it covets. Johnson also deserves much thanks for bringing to light the serious work of Palestinian environmentalists and the original environmentalists, the farmers and bedouin of Palestine.

 

 

Babies have been drinking milk from bottles for thousands of years

By - Sep 28,2019 - Last updated at Sep 28,2019

A late Bronze Age feeding vessel from Vosendorf, Austria, dating from about 1,200 to 800 BC (Photo courtesy of Katharina Rebay-Salisbury/TNS)

By Deborah Netburn 

The vessels are small and ceramic. Some resemble tiny teapots, others look like small pipes, and a few are sculpted into whimsical animal shapes with a little spout on the backside.

When they were discovered in ancient cemeteries scattered across Europe, some archaeologists wondered if they were used to feed the sick or the elderly. But because they were often buried in graves alongside infants, most experts agreed that the vessels likely served a different purpose entirely:

Call them prehistoric baby bottles.

Now, a new chemical analysis of three of these ancient containers provides further evidence that the vessels were indeed used to feed milk from cows, sheep or goats to human babies.

“People have known about these containers for a long time and assumed they were baby bottles, but nobody had done a thorough analysis on them,” said Julie Dunne, a chemist at the University of Bristol in England, who led the work. “What I liked about this study is that it gave us a nice, close connection to parents of the past.”

Dunne works in the university’s Organic Geochemistry Unit, a research group that has chemically analysed roughly 10,000 shards of pottery from around the world to help archaeologists better understand what foods and other materials the artefacts once contained.

Their work has revealed that lipids, the building blocks of fats, can survive for thousands of years.

“What we know from years of experimental work is that fats absorb into the ceramic matrix of the vessel and are often preserved there,” Dunne said. “Because of that, lipids do survive in about 80 per cent of the assemblages we’ve looked at.”

In the new study, Dunne and her colleagues collected samples from three ceramic baby bottles that had been found next to infants in ancient German burial sites. Two of the bottles came from a cemetery complex that scientists believe was in use between 800 and 450 BC; the other bottle was found in a site dated to 1200 to 800 BC. (The earliest-known ceramic baby bottles have been dated to about 5,000 BC.

The researchers had been looking for vessels that had wide openings, so they would be easier to work with. Still, Dunne said that collecting samples from the bottles was a nerve-racking experience.

Usually, her team begins its analysis by grinding up pieces of old cooking pots. But since the small bottles were still intact, that was not an option.

“We had to adopt a modified strategy,” she said.

They cleaned the interior surfaces of the vessels, then drilled out just enough ceramic powder to be able to see any lipids that had been absorbed by the pottery. Next, they used a chemical process to free the lipids from the ceramic matrix, allowing them to measure the chemical and isotopic fingerprint of each one.

Ultimately, they found that the vessels contained fatty acids from dairy products — almost certainly milk — that came from domesticated ruminant animals, according to their report in the journal Nature. They were not able to tell if the milk came from cows, sheep or goats.

The work represents “the earliest known evidence of animal milk in small bottles for infants,” Sin Halcrow, a bioarchaeologist at the University of Otago in New Zealand, wrote in an essay accompanying the paper.

Halcrow, who was not involved in the study, added that the work also “provides crucial insight into the diet of developing infants in prehistoric human populations”.

Dunne said she hopes the new work will lead to a much larger study that will apply the same kinds of analytic tools to ceramic baby bottles across a larger geographical area.

“We know the ancient Greeks were using similar vessels, also the Romans, and some have been found in prehistoric Sudan in north Africa,” she said. “It would be fantastic to do a really large-scale study to see if they are always used to hold milk or if they had other foods processed in them.”

The authors noted that while breast milk has always been integral to infant care across history and cultures, there is considerable variation among human societies as to when new foods are introduced and how long a child continues to get nutrition directly from mom.

For example, archaeologists have found that hunter-gatherers typically breastfed for several years, whereas the more sedentary lifestyle of early farming communities allowed mothers to stop nursing earlier because other foods were more readily available.

It is possible that this shorter weaning period may also have led to shorter birth intervals between children, the authors wrote. That, in turn, could have contributed to the considerable growth in population known as the Neolithic demographic transition.

Dunne and her fellow researchers were curious to see how a modern-day infant would respond to a replica of one of the ancient bottles, so they recruited the baby of one of their friends.

The rounded shape of the prehistoric bottle fit perfectly in the young child’s hands. The scientists poured in some milk and tipped a bit of it into the baby’s mouth. The baby quickly started sucking the spout to get a bigger drink.

The ancient baby bottle technology still worked.

Teens flock to flavoured vaping which hides grave health dangers

By - Sep 28,2019 - Last updated at Sep 28,2019

By Soumya Karlamangla 

LOS ANGELES — High schoolers rallying in downtown Los Angeles this week chanted “Fight the flavour” as they showed their support for banning the flavoured tobacco products that health experts say are fuelling an epidemic of nicotine addiction among youths.

Among the demonstrators was Jennyfer Cortez, 16, who said she tried an e-cigarette for the first time five years ago because it tasted like blueberries, her favourite fruit. She didn’t like vaping because it made her cough, but she has seen her peers vape at their lockers, in the school bathroom and sometimes even in class.

“These kids are so addicted to nicotine, they can’t go one class period without vaping,” said Cortez, a junior at Ánimo Jackie Robinson Charter High School in South L.A.

Governments around the nation are considering banning flavoured tobacco products amid burgeoning e-cigarette use among youths and a mysterious outbreak of a serious lung disease that appears to be linked to vaping. The legislative efforts would eliminate the fruity e-cigarette pods with flavours such as mango, strawberry and mint, which public health experts say are giving nicotine a foothold among youths.

Many of the regulations, including the one being considered by Los Angeles County officials that drew demonstrators to downtown L.A. on Tuesday, would also outlaw menthol cigarettes. Public health experts say the marketing and sustained popularity of menthol cigarettes provide a window into the playbook that e-cigarette companies could be using when it comes to selling flavoured nicotine products.

Menthol cigarettes, which were invented in the 1920s, were promoted as healthier than regular cigarettes, despite being more dangerous, experts say.

Aggressive marketing of menthol cigarettes to African Americans worked — approximately 85 per cent of African American smokers now prefer menthols, said Phillip Gardiner, a researcher with the University of California’s Tobacco-Related Disease Research Programme.

Over the last century, attempts to ban menthols have failed, because of lobbying by the tobacco industry as well as the cigarettes’ ubiquity, experts say. The Trump administration announced a proposal last year to take them off the market, but the effort appears to have stalled.

“Menthol is the ultimate candy flavour — it helps the poison go down easier,” Gardiner said.

Youths are experimenting with flavoured e-cigarettes; from 2017 to 2018, e-cigarette usage among high schoolers jumped 78 per cent, according to the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. E-cigarette devices work by heating a liquid cartridge containing nicotine, and perhaps an added flavour, and turning it into a vapour the user can inhale.

This month, Michigan became the first state in the nation to ban flavoured e-cigarettes. The Trump administration said this month that it is also considering outlawing the products.

The concerns about flavoured tobacco products mirror those about menthol cigarettes, which are flavoured with a mint extract and have served as a gateway to addiction for almost a century, experts say.

“Tobacco companies have known this for a very long time…. Nicotine on its own is really bitter tasting, it does not taste good at all,” said Thomas Ylioja, a tobacco cessation expert at National Jewish Health, a research hospital in Denver. “As a former youth smoker myself, menthol was how I got started.”

Legend has it that in 1925, a man named Lloyd “Spud” Hughes placed his tobacco in a baking powder tin along with menthol crystals, which he was using to treat a cold. The next day, he rolled his tobacco and accidentally created a menthol cigarette.

Over the following decades, many companies began selling menthols, marketing them as a less harsh alternative to traditional cigarettes.

Tobacco executives noticed a slight preference for menthols among African Americans and began targeting them with advertising. Popular menthol brand Kool hired Elston Howard, an African American catcher for the New York Yankees, as a spokesman, and cigarette companies bought ads in Ebony magazine. Predictably, the percentage of black people smoking menthols skyrocketed, according to a paper Gardiner wrote detailing what he calls the “African Americanisation of menthol cigarette use”.

“Unfortunately, the tobacco industry efforts have been very successful,” Gardiner said in an interview.

Menthol not only makes tobacco taste better, it also numbs the throat so people can smoke more cigarettes, he said. Worse, menthol allows for deeper inhalation of the smoke, which lets more nicotine into the body, which makes people more addicted, he said.

In 2009, a federal law outlawed many flavoured cigarettes, such as chocolate and vanilla, but not menthol. The long-term success of menthols paved the way for flavoured e-cigarettes, said Bill Novelli, former president of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids.

“It seems pretty clear that these flavours were basically created to seduce and entice kids into smoking,” he said.

The results of a survey conducted by the American Heart Assn. of 1,500 adult e-cigarette users published this month found that nearly a third of adults who use e-cigarettes said a primary reason they started was because of the flavours. That percentage was even higher among young adults, according to the survey.

“The flavouring in these nicotine products attracts younger people at a time when they are most likely to become addicted if they try it,” said Dr Jessica Sims with the American Heart Association.

However, those opposed to banning flavoured e-cigarettes say they offer a way for smokers to switch to a safer alternative. Experts agree that despite the risks of e-cigarettes, they remain less dangerous than traditional cigarettes.

At the rally outside the LA County Board of Supervisors meeting Tuesday, people shouted “Save our vapes” over the high schoolers.

Alan Ngo, 32, held a sign that said, “I Vote, I Vape”. Four years ago, he switched from smoking to vaping, the only thing that helped him quit traditional cigarettes, he said. He said his lungs feel better than they did before. He is able to run farther and he coughs less, he said.

“I think the flavours save lives,” said Ngo, who lives in Rosemead.

At the meeting on Tuesday, county supervisors advanced the ban on flavoured tobacco, which would make illegal not only the fruity pods of liquid nicotine and traditional menthol cigarettes, but also mint chewing tobacco and cream cigars, among other products. The ban will affect only unincorporated areas, which include about 1 million people.

Also on Tuesday, Kevin Burns, the chief executive of e-cigarette giant Juul, stepped down. His replacement, K.C. Crosthwaite, said the company would suspend all advertising in the United States and would refrain from lobbying the Trump administration on its proposed ban of flavoured e-cigarette products.

In a statement, Crosthwaite acknowledged the company must work with policymakers and regulators because its “future is at risk due to unacceptable levels of youth usage and eroding public confidence in our industry.”

Pages

Pages



Newsletter

Get top stories and blog posts emailed to you each day.

PDF