You are here

Trump presidency should bring clarity to Palestine

Jan 03,2017 - Last updated at Jan 03,2017

Israel is dizzy. January 20 will be like another Christmas Day and Donald Trump the jolly old Santa Claus bearing gifts.

The writing is already on the wall as President-elect Trump appointed an extremist, David Friedman, as the next US ambassador to Israel; he intends to relocate the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem and supports the expansion of illegal colonies that have already sliced up the envisaged Palestinian state into South Africa-like Bantustans.

Thus, it must be odd, if not altogether provocative, to suggest that a Trump presidency could be the coup de grace that Palestinians and, in fact, the entire Middle East need to liberate themselves from the weight of an overbearing, arrogant and futile American foreign policy that has extended for decades.

Unmistakably, a Trump presidency is clearly terrible for Palestinians in the short term.

The man does not even attempt to show a degree of impartiality or an iota of balance as he approaches the Middle East’s most protracted and delicate conflict.

According to the seemingly infinite stream of his tweets, Trump is counting the days to when he can show Israeli leaders how pro-Israel his administration is.

Shortly after the US abstained from voting on a United Nations Security Council Resolution 2334 that condemned Israel’s illegal settlements, on December 23, Trump tweeted: “As to the UN, things will be different after January 20.”

Trump took to Twitter once more, shortly before Secretary of State John Kerry delivered a major policy speech on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, chastising Israel for jeopardising the two-state solution and calling the current government of Benjamin Netanyahu the most rightwing in Israel’s history.

In his retort, Trump called on Israel to “stay strong” until his inauguration on January 20. 

Israeli leaders are eying the date, too, with the likes of Naftali Bennett, the head of the extremist Jewish Home Party, expecting a “reset” of Israeli-US relations once Trump is president.

Furthermore, “we have a chance to reset the structure across the Middle East”, Bennett, who is also Israel’s minister of education, told journalists last November.

“We have to seize that opportunity and act on it,” he said.

One of the impending “opportunities” presented by the Trump presidency is that “the era of the Palestinian state is over”.

Of course, Kerry is right. The current Israeli government is the most rightwing and most extreme, a trend that will not change any time soon, since it is an accurate reflection of the political and societal mood in the country. 

Read how Bennett responded to Kerry’s speech: “Kerry quoted me three times, anonymously, in his speech in order to demonstrate that we oppose a Palestinian state, so let me state it explicitly: Yes. If it depends on me, we will not establish another terror state in the heart of our country.”

As for Kerry’s reiteration that Jerusalem should be a capital for both Israel and Palestine, Bennett responded: “Jerusalem has been the Jewish capital for 3,000 years. That is in the Bible, open it and read.”

The stranglehold of religious zealotry on Israeli politics is irreversible, at least for the foreseeable future. 

While, in the past, secular Jewish politicians used religious notions to appeal to religious Jews in exchange for their votes and to populate illegal settlements, it is the religious groups that now set the tone of mainstream Israeli politics.

So how could this benefit Palestinians in any way?

Simply put: clarity.

Since mid-level US officials agreed to meet with a Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) delegation in Tunisia in the late 1980s, the US has chosen a most bewildering path of peacemaking.

Soon after the US hesitantly “engaged” the PLO — once the latter had to jump through a thousand political hoops to receive the US nod of approval — the US was left alone to define what “peace” between Israel and its Palestinian and Arab neighbours entailed.

The White House set the parameters of the “peace process”, corralled Arabs on many occasions to have them rubber-stamp whatever peace “vision” the US found suitable, and divided the Arabs into “moderates” and “radicals”, based solely on how a certain country would perceive US dictates of “peace” in the region.

Without any mandate, the US designated itself as an “honest peace broker”, yet did everything wrong to jeopardise the accomplishment of the very parameters that it had set to achieve the supposed peace.

While it went as far as describing Israel’s illegal settlement construction as an “obstacle to peace”, Washington funded the settlements and the occupation army entrusted with protecting those illegal entities. 

It called for “confidence building measures” while, at the same time, bankrolling the Israeli military and justifying Israel’s wars in Gaza and its excessive violence in the occupied West Bank and Jerusalem.

In other words, for decades, the US has done precisely the exact opposite of what it publicly preached.

The US’ political schizophrenia is on full display at the moment.

While Obama dared to commit the unspeakable in December — as in abstaining from a vote on a resolution that demanded that Israel halt its illegal settlements in the West Bank — only a few weeks earlier, he had handed Israel “the largest military aid deal in history”.

The US blind support of Israel throughout the years increased the latter’s expectations to the point that it now anticipates US support to continue even when Israel is ruled by extremists who are further destabilising an already fragile and unstable region.

According to Israeli logic, such expectations are quite rational. 

The US has served as an enabler of Israel’s political and military belligerence, while pacifying the Palestinians and the Arabs with empty promises, with threats at times, with handouts and with mere words.

The so-called “moderate Palestinians”, the likes of Mahmoud Abbas and his Palestinian Authority, were duly pacified, indeed, for they won the trappings of “power”, coupled with US political validation, while allowing Israel to conquer whatever remained of Palestine.

But that era is, indeed, over.

While the US will continue to enable Israel’s intransigence, a Trump presidency is likely to witness a complete departure from the Washingtonian doublespeak.

Bad will no longer be good, wrong is not right, and warmongering is not peacemaking.

In fact, Trump is set to expose American foreign policy for what it truly is, and has been for decades. 

His presidency is likely to give all parties a stark choice regarding where they stand on peace, justice and human rights. 

The Palestinians, too, will have to make a choice, face the decades long reality with a united front, or side with those who intend to “reset” the future of the Middle East based on a dark interpretation of biblical prophecies.



The writer,, has been writing about the Middle East for over 20 years. He is an internationally syndicated columnist, a media consultant, author of several books and the founder of His books include “Searching Jenin”, “The Second Palestinian Intifada” and “My Father Was a Freedom Fighter: Gaza’s Untold Story”. He contributed this article to The Jordan Times.

71 users have voted.

Add new comment

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.


Get top stories and blog posts emailed to you each day.