You are here

Moshe Ya’alon and Israel’s disconcerting ‘morality’

May 31,2016 - Last updated at May 31,2016

Israeli society is constantly swerving to the right and by doing so the country’s entire political paradigm is redefined regularly.

The statement that Israel is now “ruled by the most extreme right-wing government in its history” has grown from an informed assessment to a dull cliché over the course of only a few years.

In fact, that exact line was used in May 2015, when right-wing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu formed his thin majority government of like-minded right-wing religious zealots and ultra-nationalists.

The same sentiment, with almost the exact wording, was elicited again as Netanyahu expanded his coalition by bringing to the fold the ultra-nationalist Avigdor Lieberman. 

As of May 25, Lieberman has become Israel’s defence minister.

Considering Lieberman’s rowdy and violent politics, as demonstrated in his two terms as foreign minister (from 2009 to 2012 and again from 2013 to 2015), being a defence minister in Israel’s “most extreme right-wing government in history” harbours all kind of terrifying prospects.

While many commentators rightly pointed to Lieberman’s past provocations and wild statements — for example, his 2015 statement threatening to behead Palestinian citizens of Israel with an axe if they are not fully loyal to Israel; advocating the ethnic cleansing of Palestinian citizens of Israel; his death ultimatum to former Palestinian prime minister Ismail Haniya, and so on — his predecessor, Moshe Ya’alon, was spared much blame.

Worse, former defence minister Ya’alon was regarded by some as an example of professionalism and morality.

He is “well regarded”, wrote William Booth in The Washington Post, compared to the “polarising maverick” Lieberman. 

But “well regarded” by whom? By Israeli society, the majority of whom support the cold-blooded murder of Palestinians?

Israel has adhered to its own political terminology for a long time. Its early “socialism” was a blend of communal living facilitated by military onslaught and sustained by colonialism.

Its current definitions of “left”, “right” and “centre” are also relative, unique to Israel.

Thanks to Lieberman — a former Russian immigrant, club bouncer-turned-politician who is constantly rallying the roughly 1 million Israeli Russian Jews around his ever-violent political agenda — Ya’alon is now an example of level headedness and morality.

Indeed, reproduced numerous times in the media is Ya’alon’s stating of the reason for his resignation, which is that he lost confidence in “Netanyahu’s decision making and morals”.

Morals? Let’s examine the evidence.

Ya’alon took part in every major Israeli war since 1973, and his name was associated with the most atrocious of Israeli wars and massacres, first in Lebanon and, later, in Gaza.

His “morality” never dissuaded him from ordering some of the most unspeakable war crimes carried out against civilians, neither in Qana, Lebanon (1996) nor in Shujaya, Gaza (2014).

Ya’alon refused to cooperate with any international investigation conducted by the UN or any other monitoring group into his violent conduct.

In 2005, he was sued in a US court by the survivors of the Qana massacre, in which hundreds of civilians and UN peacekeepers were killed and wounded by Israeli strikes in Lebanon.

In that case, neither Israeli nor American morality prevailed, and justice is yet to be delivered.

Ya’alon, who received military training early in his career at the British army’s Camberley Staff College, continued to rise in rank within the army until 2002 when he was appointed chief of staff of the Israeli army.

He kept that post for nearly three years, as a result of which he ordered the assassination of hundreds of Palestinians and oversaw various massacres that were carried out by the Israeli army during the second Intifada.

His post was terminated by the then defence minister Shaul Mofaz, in 2005.

In this case, too, it was immorality, not morality, that played a role in the conflict between him and his superiors.

Ya’alon was — and remains — an ardent advocate for the illegal colonisation of Palestinian land.

In 2005, he vehemently rejected the so-called redeployment from the Gaza Strip, in which a few thousands illegal settlers were relocated to Jewish colonies in the West Bank.

His war crimes caught up with him in New Zealand in 2006 — over the assassination of a Hamas commander, Saleh Shehade, together with 14 members of his family and other civilians.

An arrest order was issued but revoked later, under heavy political pressure, allowing Ya’alon to flee the country.

He returned to the helm of the army in 2013, just in time to carry out the devastating war on Gaza in 2014, which killed 2,257 Palestinians in 51 days.

The UN monitoring group OCHA estimated that over 70 per cent of those killed were civilians, including 563 children.

The destruction of Shujaya, in particular, was a calculated strategy devised by Ya’alon himself.

In a July 2013, meeting with UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, Ya’alon informed him that he would bomb the entire neighbourhood in case of war. He did.

In May 2015, he was still unrepentant. Speaking at a conference in Jerusalem, he threatened to kill civilians in case of another war on Lebanon.

“We are going to hurt Lebanese civilians to include kids of the family,” he said. 

“We went through a very long deep discussion. We did it then, we did it in [the] Gaza Strip, we are going to do it in any round of hostilities in the future,” he said.

He also spoke implicitly of dropping a nuclear bomb on Iran. 

He repeatedly gave the Israeli occupation army the green light to carry out the “shoot to kill” policy against Palestinians to fight rising “tension” in the occupied territories. 

These are Ya’alon’s words during a visit to a military base in Gush Etzion in November 2014: “It must be clear that anyone who comes to kill Jews must be eliminated. Any terrorist who raises a gun, knife or rock, tries to run over or otherwise attack Jews, must be put to death.”

Hundreds of Palestinians were killed in recent months in occupied East Jerusalem and the West Bank. Many of those killed are stone-throwing children who are facing Israeli army vehicles along with thousands of trigger-happy Jewish settlers.

In his first public remarks since his resignation, Ya’alon accused a “vocal minority” in Israel of targeting the country’s “basic values”, stating that the country’s “moral compass” has been lost.

The odd thing is that many Israelis agree with Ya’alon. They see the man who has been accused of carrying out war crimes for most of his career as an example of morality and basic values.

While Lieberman has demonstrated to be a loose cannon and a political liability, Ya’alon has openly spoken of targeting children and repeatedly lived up to his promises.

When the likes of Ya’alon, a man with a bloodstained record, become the face of morality in Israel, once can understand why the future of that country brings little hope, especially now that Lieberman has brought his Israel Our Home Party to Netanyahu’s terrifying nest of political parties.

 

The writer, www.ramzybaroud.net, has been writing about the Middle East for over 20 years. He is an internationally syndicated columnist, a media consultant, author of several books and the founder of PalestineChronicle.com. His books include “Searching Jenin”, “The Second Palestinian Intifada” and “My Father Was a Freedom Fighter: Gaza’s Untold Story”. He contributed this article to The Jordan Times.

up
42 users have voted.


Newsletter

Get top stories and blog posts emailed to you each day.

PDF