You are here

Failure to take hold

Mar 03,2018 - Last updated at Mar 03,2018

Not long after the UN Security Council adopted a resolution calling for a ceasefire "without delay" in Syria for thirty days, warring sides in the Syrian conflict began to claim exceptions for their role in the fighting as not covered by the truce.

Turkey now says that its military intervention in and around Afrin is not covered by the resolution and it will, therefore, continue war against the Syrian Kurds in north of Syria. Damascus also says that the resolution is not binding on its continued fighting against "terrorists", without defining who the terrorists are. Iran, likewise, made similar claims about its involvement in the war as not falling within the scope of the resolution.

No doubt that Al Nusra and Al Qaeda militants may think the same and feel free to continue war against their enemies. Russia, too, may think that its aerial bombardment of "terrorists" falls outside the parameters of the resolution.

At this rate, the resolution, on which much hope had been pinned to halt the slaughter of innocent people, has been rendered without much meaning or effect.

This problem on the applicability or non-applicability of the resolution on all parties to the conflict may have arisen because of the wording of the resolution. To be sure, many words used in the operative paragraphs of the resolution were made imprecise enough on purpose to appease conflicting demands. Drafting the resolution was, therefore, not exactly all plain sailing as various members of the council bargained.

No wonder the international community now has a resolution that some parties involved in the fighting claim as non-binding to them.

up
83 users have voted.

Comments

UNFORTUNATELY IT IS FACTUALLY CORRECT THAT WE HAVE FAILURE TO HOLD AT THE UN SECURITY OR INSECURITY MEETINGS BECAUSE IT IS NOT ONLY THE SECURITY COUNCIL THAT IS STUPID BUT THE MISGUIDED USE OF PETRO-DOLLARS AND THE ALLIANCES OF GLOOMS AND DOOMS. CASE NUMBER ONE, IT IS BECOMMING CLEARER NOW THAT WHAT CAUSED THE ABRUPT STATE OF WAR BETWEEN UAE, EGYPT, SAUDI AND DOHA. AS REPORTED IN ALL NEWS MEDIA, MONEY WAS THE SPARKING FIRE THAT IGNITED THE STATE OF WAR BETWEEN BROTHERS AND SISTERS. AS USUAL, THERE IS NO NEWS MATERIAL THAT DOES NOT FOLLOW THE LAW OF AVERAGE. AS WE CAN SEE NOW, IT WAS A DIRTY MONEY DEAL GONE WRONG IF THE NEWS OF THIS WEEK IS CORRECT. THIS CAN ONLY TEACH US ONE THING WHICH IS THAT NO ONE CAN PROTECT HIS OR HER PEOPLE BETTER THAN HIS OR HER PEOPLE. THE GULF STATES SHOULD LEARN FROM THE FACT THAT " MINE IS MINE BUT OURS IS OURS." AND SO DO NOT BLAME THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL.!!!!!!!

Add new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 16 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Newsletter

Get top stories and blog posts emailed to you each day.